Skip to comments.
Libertarians To Sue State (north carolina)
thepilot.com ^
| 9 1 05
| thepilot.com
Posted on 09/01/2005 4:54:43 PM PDT by freepatriot32
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: BibChr
News flash: if the Republican Party is "good enough" for you to support, then you're perpetuating the problems that
will sink this country.
I demand more for a country born in liberty and stolen by politicians. If you're voting your principles and ambitions for your country, and are blindly voting Republican, that's sad for our country. If you're not voting your principles, that's sad too.
People who cave in and vote Republican just because it's easy are making it damn difficult to fix the problems. That's where the OldBob Doles, Lincoln Chaffees, Olympia Snowes and similar RINOs come from - they're grateful for the blind support and no demand for accountability.
21
posted on
09/01/2005 8:46:07 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Constitution Day; TaxRelief; 100%FEDUP; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; ~Vor~; A2J; a4drvr; Adder; ...
22
posted on
09/02/2005 4:02:50 AM PDT
by
Alia
To: Common Tator
"Do Libertarians believe in a God? I know some of them believe in Pat Buchanan."
Most believe in God but I don't know any who believe in Buchanan. He is an idiot....
23
posted on
09/02/2005 6:28:56 AM PDT
by
monday
To: Common Tator
"Do Libertarians believe in a God?"
I was under the impression they believe they are God. LOL
24
posted on
09/02/2005 6:32:50 AM PDT
by
verity
(Don't let your children grow up to be mainstream media maggots.)
To: BibChr
"I'm not seeing what Biblical doctrine calls on me to favor false prominence for the fringe party for drugs and hookers."
False prominence? Is that what you call treating every US citizen equally? You treat libertarians as 3rd or 4th class citizens by your own admission. That means you are a bigot and very unchristian.
25
posted on
09/02/2005 6:36:40 AM PDT
by
monday
To: BibChr
I outgrew the need to make hollow, self-referential gestures a good while ago. DanI haven't seen any evidence of that.
26
posted on
09/02/2005 6:36:45 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(My liberal neighbor is more dangerous to my freedom than Osama Bin Laden.)
To: BibChr
Of the two viable actual participants, the GOP is clearly the better choice. Kinda like syphilis is better than lung cancer.
27
posted on
09/02/2005 6:38:21 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(My liberal neighbor is more dangerous to my freedom than Osama Bin Laden.)
To: trubluolyguy
losertarians. Think that clever term up all by yourself?
28
posted on
09/02/2005 6:41:35 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(My liberal neighbor is more dangerous to my freedom than Osama Bin Laden.)
To: WestVirginiaRebel
"And they wonder why the other independents laugh at them."
Libertarians are the only third party to be on the ballot in all 50 states. The only independents who laugh at them are clueless like you.
29
posted on
09/02/2005 6:43:26 AM PDT
by
monday
To: monday
Is the article about taking away their rights as citizens? Or is it about their wanting to share prominence they haven't earned with two parties who have earned it?
I commented on the latter, you seem to be faulting me for something I never said about the former.
Read slowly, type slower.
Dan
30
posted on
09/02/2005 6:44:06 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Stepan12
When you can't argue the points, just make up lies and knock them down.
31
posted on
09/02/2005 6:50:18 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(My liberal neighbor is more dangerous to my freedom than Osama Bin Laden.)
Comment #32 Removed by Moderator
To: BibChr
"Is the article about taking away their rights as citizens? "
Thats exactly what it is about. Unconstitutional ballot laws that take away the rights of citizens to vote for who they want to vote for.
33
posted on
09/02/2005 7:43:10 AM PDT
by
monday
To: monday
Ah! Then we disagree.
Is it also un-Christian to disagree with you?
Dan
34
posted on
09/02/2005 7:44:36 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: freepatriot32
Fer cryin' out loud, Libertarians. You're asking the court to do just what we've been blasting them for: legislate from the bench! Work to get the law changed by the legislature to be more reasonable if you don't like it. Don't go in asking a judge to ignore a properly enacted statute.
35
posted on
09/02/2005 7:48:31 AM PDT
by
TChris
("The central issue is America's credibility and will to prevail" - Goh Chok Tong)
To: monday
False prominence? Is that what you call treating every US citizen equally? You treat libertarians as 3rd or 4th class citizens by your own admission. That means you are a bigot and very unchristian. Oh brother.
Every citizen is equal in this case! Every citizen has the right to form a political party which, if 75,000 or more signatures appear on a petition, may appear on the ballot. The same standard applies to every citizen. Quit your crying about unfairness. The Libertarian party simply doesn't have the numbers to meet the statutary requirements.
36
posted on
09/02/2005 7:52:18 AM PDT
by
TChris
("The central issue is America's credibility and will to prevail" - Goh Chok Tong)
To: TChris
"The Libertarian party simply doesn't have the numbers to meet the statutary requirements."
Because the statutory requirements are unfair.
37
posted on
09/02/2005 7:55:21 AM PDT
by
monday
To: monday
Because the statutory requirements are unfair.Then work to get the statute changed legitimately! Don't pull a DemocRAT, demand-judicial-activism-for-my-cause stunt. It will only damage your credibility.
38
posted on
09/02/2005 10:48:10 AM PDT
by
TChris
("The central issue is America's credibility and will to prevail" - Goh Chok Tong)
To: Protagoras
When you can't argue the points, just make up lies and knock them down.One of the most fascinating things about Libertarianism is their foam-at-the-mouth hatred for the Jewish state. They sound like the Nazis and this may be no accident. The anti-Semitism of the Nazi Germans was extremely vicious and special, perhaps, because of the sexual perversion of the Nazi hierarchy themselves (read the Pink Swastika).
The Libertarian party is the party of perversion, as the Objectivists so rightly call it, so they're like the Nazis that way and in their hatred of the Jews -- manifested with their foam-at-the-mouth hatred for Israel.
Maybe the authors of the Pink Swastika, Lively & Abrams, can do a commentary on the Libertarian party, too. Maybe I'll write to them about it. >>>>veg<<<
39
posted on
09/02/2005 12:40:08 PM PDT
by
Stepan12
To: Stepan12
40
posted on
09/02/2005 12:43:03 PM PDT
by
Protagoras
(My liberal neighbor is more dangerous to my freedom than Osama Bin Laden.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson