[monday]

"Then work to get the statute changed legitimately! Don't pull a DemocRAT, demand-judicial-activism-for-my-cause stunt. It will only damage your credibility."

lol... You aren't really that dumb are you? How will voting for a Democrat or Republican ever change the statute. They are the ones who passed the unconstitutional statute in the first place. Oh, and speaking of credibility, since you are defending an unconstitutional statute, you have none.

[TChris]

lol... You aren't really that dumb are you?

Beginning with an ad hominem attack is always the hallmark of intelligent debate.

How will voting for a Democrat or Republican ever change the statute.

I'm quite sure I didn't say anything about voting Democrat or Republican. Did you read my post?

They are the ones who passed the unconstitutional statute in the first place.

You, as others, have alleged that the statute requiring a certain number of signatures on a petition to qualify a political party to appear on the ballot is unconstitutional. How, exactly? What provision of the Constitution has been violated by this law? Every candidate may receive votes if he/she is written in on the ballot.

Are you claiming that any group that claims to be a political party should be given a slot on the ballot, regardless of the number its members?

Oh, and speaking of credibility, since you are defending an unconstitutional statute, you have none.

Neener neener.