Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EagleUSA

Well... I gotta say that there is simply no evidence against this guy. I mean he is more than likely guilty, but there is simply no evidence to prosecute him. You can't continously hold the guy in jail if they have nothing on him to build a case. There was probably bungling on the part of the Aruban authorities in the beginning of the investigation.


8 posted on 09/06/2005 7:47:08 AM PDT by ruschpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ruschpa

The burden was on the prosecution to prove that a crime had been committed Obviously, they couldn't prove that. So, he was let go.


10 posted on 09/06/2005 7:49:52 AM PDT by American Butterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: ruschpa

Well... I gotta say that there is simply no evidence against this guy.
-----
As far as you (we) know. Other than the FACT that all three of these guys LIED and changed their stories multiple times. This is the problem with Aruba -- they can and do withhold information from the public. It all smells of fish to me....


12 posted on 09/06/2005 7:51:38 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson