Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Supreme Court Asked to Block Military Base Closing List
Dow Jones Newswires | 9-8-05 | Unknown

Posted on 09/08/2005 12:31:16 PM PDT by lilylangtree

WASHINGTON (AP)--The U.S. Supreme Court was asked Thursday to block a federal panel from sending to President George W. Bush its recommendations for closing or realigning hundreds of military bases nationwide.

Sen. Jon Corzine, D-N.J., filed the request for an emergency stay with Justice David H. Souter, who could handle the matter himself or request a vote of the eight remaining justices.

In court papers, lawyers representing Corzine and other New Jersey state and congressional officials said they wanted a temporary reprieve so that they could file a full appeal of the decision by the Base Closure and Realignment Commission to close Fort Monmouth.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday rejected the politicians' efforts to stop the panel from closing the Army research and development post based in New Jersey.

In other base closings lawsuits around the country, a Massachusetts judge on Thursday rejected the state's efforts to keep the Otis Air National Guard Base open.

The list was expected to be presented Thursday to Bush, who has pledged to give it to Congress without making any changes. Congress then can vote the entire list up or down, but may not modify it.

Fort Monmouth was one of more than 800 military installations that the base-closing panel recommended closing or consolidating. The Massachusetts case involved Otis Air National Guard base.

Massachusetts was one of several states to challenge BRAC's findings on the grounds that changes to their National Guard units or bases must be approved by governors. The others have had mixed results.

On Wednesday, judges stopped the panel from recommending changes at Air National Guard bases in Connecticut and Tennessee, and Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich filed a court appeal to block a plan to move fighter jets out of his state.

A federal judge in St. Louis threw out a Missouri lawsuit, saying she had no authority to hear the case because the BRAC decision was still preliminary. Washington state also has filed a lawsuit.

The federal government contends the commission's recommendations are not reviewable by the courts.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 109th; brac; corzine; obstructionistdems; scotus
Hehehehe!
1 posted on 09/08/2005 12:31:20 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Let the states keep the bases, and move the soldiers or airman.

I am sure the the states would like to form militias to man the bases that the fedgov no longer says it needs.

2 posted on 09/08/2005 12:34:48 PM PDT by dts32041 (Shinkichi: Massuer, did you see that? Zatôichi: I don't see much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

Guess Corzine was not paying for an apartment for the right person afterall. Darn just when you thought money could buy everything.


3 posted on 09/08/2005 12:36:22 PM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041

"Crooked Corzine" wants to keep open bases that haven't
been opened and used since the begining of WW II.


4 posted on 09/08/2005 12:37:01 PM PDT by Zenith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Let the states keep the bases, and move the soldiers or airman.

And then use the empty facility for a hurricane relief center next time around??

5 posted on 09/08/2005 12:37:28 PM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

Should read remaining 7 justices. But then, Souter may not know Rehnquist was buried yesterday.


6 posted on 09/08/2005 12:37:40 PM PDT by auboy (9 out of 10 boxes of rocks are smarter than Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
It's amazing how all of these dimocrats who can't stand the military get their panties in a bunch when the military is about to leave their states(with the revenue that they generate).

Typically, the dims try to pull out the courts to get their way and overturn/halt the legislative or executive branch activities.

The libs really are pathetic and completely without a moral compass.

7 posted on 09/08/2005 12:39:49 PM PDT by skimbell (ATF should be a convenience store, not a government agency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041

The states usually do get to keep the bases don't they?

If not, I agree - give the land BACK to the states where it belongs anyway. The federal govt, if it wants the use of a state's land can sign a renewable lease and pay for it.


8 posted on 09/08/2005 12:43:13 PM PDT by hombre_sincero (www.sigmaitsys.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

You expressed what I'm thinking. That's why I'm laughing.


9 posted on 09/08/2005 12:44:22 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
I just hate having a governor whose nickname "BJ" is a euphemism for a Lewinsky.

I guess it beats having a governor who makes bad spaghetti?

Maine anyone.

10 posted on 09/08/2005 12:44:56 PM PDT by dts32041 (Shinkichi: Massuer, did you see that? Zatôichi: I don't see much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hombre_sincero

oops posted before I finished -

Let me add - the federal govt can use land for military bases at no cost, but the land still belongs to the state and is only loaned to the central govt. This is to keep control if and when a base is close.

The lease option is for any other land use - including parks! Lot's of coal now under the "park" category thanks to willie boy clinton.


11 posted on 09/08/2005 12:46:33 PM PDT by hombre_sincero (www.sigmaitsys.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dts32041

How about Illinoisistan-Folks here call our capitol fool Rod Blowjobovich.


12 posted on 09/08/2005 12:48:36 PM PDT by skimbell (ATF should be a convenience store, not a government agency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
That's what I said BJ, I cleaned it up for the high class crowd here.
13 posted on 09/08/2005 12:53:44 PM PDT by dts32041 (Shinkichi: Massuer, did you see that? Zatôichi: I don't see much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

"Sen. Jon Corzine, D-N.J., filed the request for an emergency stay with Justice David H. Souter, who could handle the matter himself or request a vote of the eight remaining justices."

Somebody needs to pay closer attention to current events.


14 posted on 09/08/2005 12:57:56 PM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zenith

""Crooked Corzine" wants to keep open bases that haven't
been opened and used since the begining of WW II."

The base he is trying to save, Fort Monmouth, is currently active and housing the Communications and Electronics Command (CECOM) and the West Point Prep School. I work for a Defense Contractor that services projects based out of Fort Monmouth and I live about a 1/2 mile from it. My wife's Grand Father was one of the engineers that developed RADAR there during WWII. The Fort's closing will have a big impact on this area.


15 posted on 09/08/2005 1:01:51 PM PDT by NJConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: auboy
Should read remaining 7 justices. But then, Souter may not know Rehnquist was buried yesterday.

He probably does know as does Ruth Bader Ginsberg, but I suspect those two will try to channel the vote of the late Chief Justice Rhenquist -- to whatever Ruthie, the Silent, and David, the Dumb, decide.

16 posted on 09/08/2005 1:12:48 PM PDT by Lunkhead_01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
It's amazing how all of these dimocrats who can't stand the military get their panties in a bunch when the military is about to leave their states(with the revenue that they generate).

Exactly what I was thinking.

These are the same democrats who were always anti-military and were always looking to cut miliitary expenditures so that the money could be used elsewhere, especially for social programs.

Now that the militray bases may be closed in their home states, they know that the people there who voted for them would not look kindly upon them if their bases were closed.
17 posted on 09/08/2005 1:47:27 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
when the libs don't like the people's will where is the first place they run to for asisstance?
18 posted on 09/09/2005 7:48:27 AM PDT by p23185
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson