To: thomaswest
There may be a degree of randomness in some things, thomas. I don't fear or "dislike" randomness; in fact my statement you used for your post above acknowledges the same exists--and in exciting ways.
I do believe we are not mere products of random chance, your wordy critique notwithstanding.
303 posted on
09/08/2005 7:38:33 PM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
To: Recovering_Democrat
I do believe we are not mere products of random chance, You're starting to sound like a broken record. Evolution does not make this claim. Did you bring youself up to speed by reading the educational material on evolution posted on this thread by PatrickHenry as I suggested?
I thought not.
310 posted on
09/08/2005 7:54:44 PM PDT by
Rudder
To: Recovering_Democrat
There may be a degree of randomness in some things, thomas. I don't fear or "dislike" randomness; in fact my statement you used for your post above acknowledges the same exists--and in exciting ways. I do believe we are not mere products of random chance, your wordy critique notwithstanding. Re: wordy. I do believe we are not mere products of random chance. eh? Having shown that we are all results of a great deal of random chance, you assert you "do not believe" in it.
Do you really believe that every spermatozoon and ovum were uniquely, intelligently directed, and purposely made? Do you believe this for every one of the 6 billion humans now living? What is the problem with accepting randomness being in effect in the millions of years past?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson