Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: King Prout
why did you then present it -in post#25- as a bona-fide debunking of C14 dating?

I didn't. Please re-read the post. I was asking whether we should rethink its methods. Not that C14 dating was bad. I had/have no idea.

57 posted on 09/08/2005 2:07:50 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: ShadowAce
yeah, you did:

For instance, now that Britain has found that its soil is releasing carbon due to global warming, wouldn't it be prudent to question the method of carbon dating? Isn't the "given" that carbon gets released at a steady rate over the millenia now debunked, and that the rate is determined by the warming and cooling cycles of the earth?

I am not a scientist, but I can think through evidence fairly well, and make connections to patterns.

71 posted on 09/08/2005 2:13:54 PM PDT by King Prout (and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson