Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arkinsaw
How the article is debated and what due process it gets depends on its content.

Yep. Same goes for DU. And for FR. And for any society.

Betcha there's lots of statements in lots of Wikipedia articles that the DUers find objectionable.

69 posted on 09/11/2005 2:58:36 PM PDT by sourcery ("Compelling State Interest" is the refuge of judicial activist traitors against the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery
Betcha there's lots of statements in lots of Wikipedia articles that the DUers find objectionable.

In my experience, those don't last quite as long as those on the other side. The community tends to give more leeway to articles equating Senator Santorum to details of homosexual sex than conservative terms. I watched the debates on those two and know what went on.

My favorite article is this oneBush Family Conspiracy Theory
77 posted on 09/11/2005 3:48:13 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson