Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gandalftb
Bin Laden is not moving around and is dug in very well. He is much more likely with the Baloch than with the Pashtuns or Pathans or Waziris.

What makes you think this?

18 posted on 09/12/2005 10:23:01 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Alter Kaker; gandalftb

Several members of his family are in Iran. I would not be surprised to find that he is there.

On the other hand, Baluchistan crosses the frontiers of three countries, and gives him the chance to move from Pakistan through Afghanistan to Iran as he needs to. So maybe you're right.


19 posted on 09/12/2005 10:42:01 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

I've done a number of posts on this subject, check out the whole thread:


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1481416/replies?c=1

Also, the Baloch are semitic sunni arabs, Khaleed sheikh Muhammed and Ramzi bin alshibh were Baloch. Iranian Balochistan is fairly autonomous and bin Laden was in Ladeen, Iran after Tora Bora. At least two of his sons are in Iran, smuggling, and training Baloch.


25 posted on 09/12/2005 11:28:03 AM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson