Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marron
Several members of his family are in Iran. I would not be surprised to find that he is there.

Why would Iran stick its neck out for an unpredictable Sunni nutcase, who, if found by the US, Israel or anyone else to be in the country, would only lead to the immediate elimination of the present regime? The Mullahs are a problem, but they're hardly stupid and harboring Bin Laden is about as stupid as anyone could be.

20 posted on 09/12/2005 10:47:12 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Alter Kaker
The Mullahs are a problem, but they're hardly stupid and harboring Bin Laden is about as stupid as anyone could be.

Certainly you make sense. The fact remains that at least one son and other members of Bin Ladin's family were given refuge in Iran, as were other members of his entourage.

You are probably right, though, that Iran could not give refuge to Bin Ladin himself. That doesn't mean that he isn't in Iranian territory. Iran has made it a practice not to enforce the border where Al Qaeda is concerned (those Al Qaeda crossing from Afghanistan to Iraq were given safe passage).

Thats what makes the other poster's reference to Baluchistan a good guess; Baluchistan covers territory in three countries; Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran, and none of the three countries completely controls that area.

24 posted on 09/12/2005 11:19:56 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson