Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. House backs hate crime measure protecting gays
Reuters ^ | 9-14-2005 | Joanne Kenen

Posted on 09/14/2005 4:28:18 PM PDT by COEXERJ145

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 361-366 next last
To: kesg

Well, duh...Commerce Clause of course. Didn't you know that hate crimes are part of "Commerce among of the several states" (no, really, that's the basis!)


201 posted on 09/15/2005 4:09:25 AM PDT by Tarkin (Janice Rogers Brown to the SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rockabyebaby
"Isn't EVERY crime a hate crime"

No. Some crimes are motivated by cold blooded greed-- which can appear even more demented, IMHO. I think that a white man who kills for a pair of shoes should be put to death just as quickly as a black man who wants to 'kill whitey'.

Lust may also be involved. A pervert rapes a little girl and kills her to keep from being caught. That is far worse than a black man 'killing whitey'. The pervert, out to save his scaly hide and molest again: such a creep should be castrated, and then cauterized to stop the bleeding-- without medical assistance or anesthesia-- three days before his scheduled execution.

I'm not out the punish the Black Panthers any more than any other criminal. But a little consistency would be nice, too. Illegal aliens who murder in the US need to be executed, PERIOD! NO EXCUSES. The UN needs to pay more attention to Mugabe and worry a lot less about murderers' rights.

But of course, it's not the Black Panthers who were targeted. It's the group that kills less per million being targeted, of course.
202 posted on 09/15/2005 4:12:35 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March ("...most mayors in this country have a hard time getting their people to work on a sunny day...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

I may not be an expert, but didn't United States v. Morrison declare such laws unconstitutional?

UNITED STATES v. MORRISON (99-5)
169 F.3d 820, affirmed.

Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court.

In these cases we consider the constitutionality of 42 U.S.C. § 13981 which provides a federal civil remedy for the victims of gender-motivated violence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, struck down §13981 because it concluded that Congress lacked constitutional authority to enact the section’s civil remedy. Believing that these cases are controlled by our decisions in United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995), United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883), and the Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883), we affirm.


203 posted on 09/15/2005 4:12:47 AM PDT by Tarkin (Janice Rogers Brown to the SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark

If I say a two parent heterosexual marriage is superior for raising children can I be jailed?

@@@@

If I try to publish a reader for public school children that has the words 'mother' and 'father' in it am I guilty of hate speech? Those words will be erased, as soon as marriage doesn't require one man and one woman.


204 posted on 09/15/2005 4:15:05 AM PDT by maica (Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home. ---Allegra (in Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Here we have the Information Age ripping apart the entire concept of superior citizenship via hate crime laws. We have a GOP majority in the House and Senate. We have the White House. We have a GOP court. What's so DAMX GREAT about the GOP? Nothing. Why should I feel a shred of loyalty to those creeps? Increasing NEA funding, spending money like there's no tomorrow, and trying to bribe illegal aliens for votes.

New tagline:


205 posted on 09/15/2005 4:21:14 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (The only thing 'grand' about the GOP is they aren't the DNC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Remember the Philly Five? The House now wants to validate the witch hunt of 'Repent America'?


206 posted on 09/15/2005 4:23:00 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (The only thing 'grand' about the GOP is they aren't the DNC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: maica

I don't know all the specs. on this. But let us never forget what the law of Philadelphia is already capable of:

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42356

One of the attorneys for the Christian protesters who are criminally charged for evangelizing at an outdoor homosexual event in Philadelphia has renewed an appeal in federal court, citing the Supreme Court statement "Speech cannot be ... punished or banned simply because it might offend a hostile mob." ...

"...If convicted, they could each get a maximum of 47 years in prison..."

The case was later thrown out, due PURELY to political pressure on the city. Technically, they had the power to send Christian protesters away for 47 years. Why? For exercizing their religion and free speech. The city insisted that a public street could be used for an exclusive party, while sodomites [the super-citizens] sue to join in religious parades.


207 posted on 09/15/2005 4:37:01 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (The only thing 'grand' about the GOP is they aren't the DNC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

I am getting so disgusted with the Republican party, that I'm seriously contemplating leaving it for a party that is serious about keeping government small, protecting our nation from the Jihadists, keeping the borders borders instead of a turnstiles, and supporting morality.


208 posted on 09/15/2005 4:43:16 AM PDT by tomahawk (Proud to be an enemy of Islam (check out www.prophetofdoom.net))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Great, a pro pedophile bill attached to a "child protection" act.

The burden of proof lay on the married white male protecting kids from genocidal AIDS infesting degeneracy and waste of life to be exterminated in the pedophile cult courts in a neighborhood near you.


209 posted on 09/15/2005 4:47:18 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Fag Hitlerian blackmail goes on


210 posted on 09/15/2005 4:48:25 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll

I forgot to add sarcasm


211 posted on 09/15/2005 4:49:43 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I think there ought be protection for short middleaged blonde, blue eyed females!


212 posted on 09/15/2005 5:20:24 AM PDT by tutstar (OurFlorida.true.ws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

How about a law protecting white men from hate crimes.


213 posted on 09/15/2005 5:22:00 AM PDT by biblewonk (Luke 11:28 Yea rather , blessed are they that hear the word of God, and keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog

For the clicking impaired who also need protection.....

Lev 20:13 " 'If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.


214 posted on 09/15/2005 5:23:39 AM PDT by tutstar (OurFlorida.true.ws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift; floriduh voter; OXENinFLA

Yikes!!

Katherine Harris voted YEA! Come on girl, real men like women not other guys.


215 posted on 09/15/2005 5:25:55 AM PDT by tutstar (OurFlorida.true.ws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
This is a steaming pile................



Mr. CONYERS. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentlewoman, and I think that covers it.

The Acting CHAIRMAN (Mr. Sweeney). The question is on amendment offered by the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Conyers).

The amendment was agreed to.

AMENDMENT NO. 25 OFFERED BY MR. CONYERS

Mr. CONYERS. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.

The Acting CHAIRMAN. The Clerk will designate the amendment.

The text of the amendment is as follows:

Amendment No. 25 offered by Mr. Conyers:

At the end of the bill, add the following new title:


TITLE VI--LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT HATE CRIMES PREVENTION

SECTION 601. SHORT TITLE.

This title may be cited as the ``Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2005''.

SEC. 602. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:

(1) The incidence of violence motivated by the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of the victim poses a serious national problem.

(2) Such violence disrupts the tranquility and safety of communities and is deeply divisive.

(3) State and local authorities are now and will continue to be responsible for prosecuting the overwhelming majority of violent crimes in the United States, including violent crimes motivated by bias. These authorities can carry out their responsibilities more effectively with greater Federal assistance.

(4) Existing Federal law is inadequate to address this problem.

(5) The prominent characteristic of a violent crime motivated by bias is that it devastates not just the actual victim and the family and friends of the victim, but frequently savages the community sharing the traits that caused the victim to be selected.

(6) Such violence substantially affects interstate commerce in many ways, including--

(A) by impeding the movement of members of targeted groups and forcing such members to move across State lines to escape the incidence or risk of such violence; and

(B) by preventing members of targeted groups from purchasing goods and services, obtaining or sustaining employment, or participating in other commercial activity.

(7) Perpetrators cross State lines to commit such violence.

(8) Channels, facilities, and instrumentalities of interstate commerce are used to facilitate the commission of such violence.

(9) Such violence is committed using articles that have traveled in interstate commerce.

(10) For generations, the institutions of slavery and involuntary servitude were defined by the race, color, and ancestry of those held in bondage. Slavery and involuntary servitude were enforced, both prior to and after the adoption of the 13th amendment to the Constitution of the United States, through widespread public and private violence directed at persons because of their race, color, or ancestry, or perceived race, color, or ancestry. Accordingly, eliminating racially motivated violence is an important means of eliminating, to the extent possible, the badges, incidents, and relics of slavery and involuntary servitude.

(11) Both at the time when the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution of the United States were adopted, and continuing to date, members of certain religious and national origin groups were and are perceived to be distinct ``races''. Thus, in order to eliminate, to the extent possible, the badges, incidents, and relics of slavery, it is necessary to prohibit assaults on the basis of real or perceived religions or national origins, at least to the extent such religions or national origins were regarded as races at the time of the adoption of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

(12) Federal jurisdiction over certain violent crimes motivated by bias enables Federal, State, and local authorities to work together as partners in the investigation and prosecution of such crimes.

(13) The problem of crimes motivated by bias is sufficiently serious, widespread, and interstate in nature as to warrant Federal assistance to States and local jurisdictions.

SEC. 603. DEFINITION OF HATE CRIME.

In this title, the term ``hate crime'' has the same meaning as in section 280003(a) of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (28 U.S.C. 994 note).

SEC. 604. SUPPORT FOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND PROSECUTIONS BY STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS.

(a) Assistance Other Than Financial Assistance.--

(1) IN GENERAL.--At the request of a law enforcement official of a State or Indian tribe, the Attorney General may provide technical, forensic, prosecutorial, or any other form of assistance in the criminal investigation or prosecution of any crime that--

(A) constitutes a crime of violence (as defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code);

(B) constitutes a felony under the laws of the State or Indian tribe; and

(C) is motivated by prejudice based on the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of the victim, or is a violation of the hate crime laws of the State or Indian tribe.

(2) PRIORITY.--In providing assistance under paragraph (1), the Attorney General shall give priority to crimes committed by offenders who have committed crimes in more than 1 State and to rural jurisdictions that have difficulty covering the extraordinary expenses relating to the investigation or prosecution of the crime.

(b) Grants.--

(1) IN GENERAL.--The Attorney General may award grants to assist State, local, and Indian law enforcement officials with the extraordinary expenses associated with the investigation and prosecution of hate crimes.

(2) OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS.--In implementing the grant program, the Office of Justice Programs shall work closely with the funded jurisdictions to ensure that the concerns and needs of all affected parties, including community groups and schools, colleges, and universities, are addressed through the local infrastructure developed under the grants.

(3) APPLICATION.--

(A) IN GENERAL.--Each State that desires a grant under this subsection shall submit an application to the Attorney General at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by or containing such information as the Attorney General shall reasonably require.

(B) DATE FOR SUBMISSION.--Applications submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted during the 60-day period beginning on a date that the Attorney General shall prescribe.

(C) REQUIREMENTS.--A State or political subdivision of a State or tribal official applying for assistance under this subsection shall--

(i) describe the extraordinary purposes for which the grant is needed;

(ii) certify that the State, political subdivision, or Indian tribe lacks the resources necessary to investigate or prosecute the hate crime;

[Page: H7919] GPO's PDF

(iii) demonstrate that, in developing a plan to implement the grant, the State, political subdivision, or tribal official has consulted and coordinated with nonprofit, nongovernmental victim services programs that have experience in providing services to victims of hate crimes; and

(iv) certify that any Federal funds received under this subsection will be used to supplement, not supplant, non-Federal funds that would otherwise be available for activities funded under this subsection.

(4) DEADLINE.--An application for a grant under this subsection shall be approved or disapproved by the Attorney General not later than 30 business days after the date on which the Attorney General receives the application.

(5) GRANT AMOUNT.--A grant under this subsection shall not exceed $100,000 for any single jurisdiction within a 1 year period.

(6) REPORT.--Not later than December 31, 2006, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress a report describing the applications submitted for grants under this subsection, the award of such grants, and the purposes for which the grant amounts were expended.

(7) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 2007.

SEC. 605. GRANT PROGRAM.

(a) Authority to Make Grants.--The Office of Justice Programs of the Department of Justice shall award grants, in accordance with such regulations as the Attorney General may prescribe, to State and local programs designed to combat hate crimes committed by juveniles, including programs to train local law enforcement officers in identifying, investigating, prosecuting, and preventing hate crimes.

(b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.

SEC. 606. AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL TO ASSIST STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT.

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Justice, including the Community Relations Service, for fiscal years 2006, 2007, and 2008 such sums as are necessary to increase the number of personnel to prevent and respond to alleged violations of section 249 of title 18, United States Code, as added by section 607.

SEC. 607. PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN HATE CRIME ACTS.

(a) In General.--Chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:``§249. Hate crime acts

``(a) In General.--

``(1) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN.--Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin of any person--

``(A) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and

``(B) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if--

``(i) death results from the offense; or

``(ii) the offense includes kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.

``(2) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, GENDER, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, OR DISABILITY.--

``(A) IN GENERAL.--Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B), willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability of any person--

``(i) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and

``(ii) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if--

``(I) death results from the offense; or

``(II) the offense includes kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.

``(B) CIRCUMSTANCES DESCRIBED.--For purposes of subparagraph (A), the circumstances described in this subparagraph are that--

``(i) the conduct described in subparagraph (A) occurs during the course of, or as the result of, the travel of the defendant or the victim--

``(I) across a State line or national border; or

``(II) using a channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce;

``(ii) the defendant uses a channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in connection with the conduct described in subparagraph (A);

``(iii) in connection with the conduct described in subparagraph (A), the defendant employs a firearm, explosive or incendiary device, or other weapon that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce; or

``(iv) the conduct described in subparagraph (A)--

``(I) interferes with commercial or other economic activity in which the victim is engaged at the time of the conduct; or

``(II) otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce.

``(b) Certification Requirement.--No prosecution of any offense described in this subsection may be undertaken by the United States, except under the certification in writing of the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, or any Assistant Attorney General specially designated by the Attorney General that--

``(1) he or she has reasonable cause to believe that the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person was a motivating factor underlying the alleged conduct of the defendant; and

``(2) he or his designee or she or her designee has consulted with State or local law enforcement officials regarding the prosecution and determined that--

``(A) the State does not have jurisdiction or does not intend to exercise jurisdiction;

``(B) the State has requested that the Federal Government assume jurisdiction;

``(C) the State does not object to the Federal Government assuming jurisdiction; or

``(D) the verdict or sentence obtained pursuant to State charges left demonstratively unvindicated the Federal interest in eradicating bias-motivated violence.

``(c) Definitions.--In this section--

``(1) the term `explosive or incendiary device' has the meaning given the term in section 232 of this title;

``(2) the term `firearm' has the meaning given the term in section 921(a) of this title; and

``(3) the term `gender identity' for the purposes of this chapter means actual or perceived gender-related characteristics.

``(d) Rule of Evidence.--In a prosecution for an offense under this section, evidence of expression or associations of the defendant may not be introduced as substantive evidence at trial, unless the evidence specifically relates to that offense. However, nothing in this section affects the rules of evidence governing impeachment of a witness.''.

(b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The analysis for chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

``249..Hate crime acts.''.

SEC. 608. STATISTICS.

Subsection (b)(1) of the first section of the Hate Crimes Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note) is amended by inserting ``gender and gender identity,'' after ``race,''.

SEC. 609. SEVERABILITY.

If any provision of this title, an amendment made by this title, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, the amendments made by this Act, and the application of the provisions of such to any person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.
216 posted on 09/15/2005 5:29:46 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Thanks for finding and publishing the text of the amendment. Conyers slipped one by Republican leadership that should have been acting as gatekeeper.

My own representative (whom I know personally) is on the Rules Committee. That committee has the means of controlling how amendments are debated and passed. I am curious about how and why this amendment got rammed through, and I am sending my representative a letter on this point. I have exchanged letters with him on hate crime legislation in the past and have gotten vigorous assurances that he would resist such legislation with every weapon in the arsenal.

When I receive his answer I will publish it here.

217 posted on 09/15/2005 5:44:13 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

Comment #218 Removed by Moderator

To: COEXERJ145

Why in the world would the House pass this under the cover of night. No one saw this coming. The pro-family movement will keep everyone of these candidates who passed this legislature accountable.


219 posted on 09/15/2005 6:01:10 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
This is the post I was telling you about:

If the House passed it, then those faggoty-assed swishes in the Senate will just float this butt-pirate piece of legislation through.

220 posted on 09/15/2005 6:07:28 AM PDT by SittinYonder (Nemo me impune lacessit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 361-366 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson