Skip to comments.Vatican to Check U.S. Seminaries on Gay Presence
Posted on 09/15/2005 12:07:00 AM PDT by Crackingham
Investigators appointed by the Vatican have been instructed to review each of the 229 Roman Catholic seminaries in the United States for "evidence of homosexuality" and for faculty members who dissent from church teaching, according to a document prepared to guide the process. The Vatican document, given to The New York Times yesterday by a priest, surfaces as Catholics await a Vatican ruling on whether homosexuals should be barred from the priesthood.
In a possible indication of the ruling's contents, the American archbishop who is supervising the seminary review said last week that "anyone who has engaged in homosexual activity or has strong homosexual inclinations," should not be admitted to a seminary.
Edwin O'Brien, archbishop for the United States military, told The National Catholic Register that the restriction should apply even to those who have not been sexually active for a decade or more.
American seminaries are under Vatican review as a result of the sexual abuse scandal that swept the priesthood in 2002. Church officials in the United States and Rome agreed that they wanted to take a closer look at how seminary candidates were screened for admission, and whether they were being prepared for lives of chastity and celibacy.
The issue of gay seminarians and priests has been in the spotlight because a study commissioned by the church found last year that about 80 percent of the young people victimized by priests were boys.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Long overdue, but bravo anyway.
The catechism says that homosexuals are called to chastity and unjust discrimination should be avoided. Obviously the Church is contented with lumping all homosexuals (even ones with no sexual behavior for a decade) with pedophiles. This is a practice doomed to fail.
2358...They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill Gods will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.
2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.
This looks like discrimination. What about homosexual rights and the Boy Scouts? They've been hounded from pillar to post over this. Will the Catholic Church have to...er...back down?
Let's see, for years the Vatican ignores what anyone on FR can find out in one hour, then there finally begins a highly formal, elephantine investigation. Many words can describe the RCC but nimble doesn't seem to be among them.
Almost all the victims were post-pubescent teenage boys,
which doesn't fit the description of "pedophilia".
If this were truly a "pedophilia" problem involving pre-pubescent children, which it is not, then heterosexuals would be as likely to offend as homosexuals. Since post-pubescent teen boys were overwhelmingly the victims, nearly all the wayward priests involved were homosexuals. The church has a particular problem with homosexual priests.
You site the catholic catechism saying that homosexuals are called to chastity and that unjust discrimination should be avoided.
The church calls everyone to stop sinning, and says no one should be unjustly discriminated against.
But priests are justly called to a higher standard than laity. The celibacy vow poses an extra challenge. The bible explicitly details quite a high standard for Bishops, one much higher than that for the laity.
Alcoholics are called to sobriety, and the church also feels they should not be unjustly discriminated against. Keeping them out of the priesthood is not unjust, doing so protects both the Church and laity. (Bishops could make an exception for an inspiring repentant one they had great confidence in). High standards are a good thing. Protecting our teenage children from sexual abuse is not unjust, and being a priest is not a right.
A few seminaries may have been particularly wayward in tolerating ongoing homosexuality. The situation might not only involve those trying and succeeding to be repentent.
Benedict is turning out to be an even better Pope than JPII.
IIRC, there was something about JPII's experiences in WWII that made it difficult for him to accuse people of homosexuality. Benedict does not have these scars, and can thus give the church a much needed house cleaning.
Pedophilia has lately been miss-applied to any deviance involving Older/Younger liasons. Just as older men are attracted to younger girls, the wayward HOMOSEXUAL priests were attracted to younger boys. Clinically, genuine pedophilia is an extremely rare affliction.
I don't think this is correct. Pedophilia is attraction to children--prepubescents. Maybe attraction to boy children is different than homosexuality--frankly, I am skeptical that this is a rationalization; but I will accept that it might be true.
However, pedophilia is irrelevant to the catholic church molestation scandal. As I understand it, the vast bulk of the molested boys were post-pubescent teenagers. Attraction by a man to a sextually mature teenage boy is homosexuality and the attempt to hide that by calling it pedophilia is mendacious. I got hit on by homosexuals (unsuccessfully for the record) when I was a teen and involved in semi-pro drama and I assure you, they were treating me like a sexually mature potential sex-partner who was a young man.
What is mendacious about this argument is that it deliberately uses the word pedophilia in two different senses for the purpose of concealing the homosexual problem in the church. It uses 'pedophilia' in the popular sense to mean sex with any underage person to get the reader agreeing that pedophilia is the problem. Then, without informing the reader, it uses 'pedophilia' in the technical sense (meaning sex with prepubescent children) when quoting the 'experts,' thereby suggesting that the catholic church's problem is not a homosexual problem. It is.
The scriptures clearly disagree with this one. Apparently a homo-promo wrote it.
"... knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them. Romans 1:32.
Of course the application will almost surely fall short of the goals, but setting blunt, pointed standards is a great starting point.
It's not approving of the practice or the lifestyle, but their being a human being, a child of God.
There are people and there are sins. Practicing homosexuality is a sin. But so is all sorts of other things. Encouraging anyone to sin is wrong. Encouraging anyone, including a person who once did homosexual practice to not sin is good.
St. Paul didn't kick out people who had in the past practiced homosexuality. He told them don't do it any more, and encouraged them.
So Catholics are encouraged to hate the sin, not the sinner.
The full quote from the catechism makes it clear that those who have a homosexual inclination must be accepted with respect, as opposed to approving of "those who practice" homosexual sex.
The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect ....
And then goes on with
"homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."142 .... Under no circumstances can they be approved. CCC 2357
"Advancement to religious vows and ordination should be barred to those who are afflicted with evil tendencies to homosexuality or pederasty, since for them the common life and the priestly ministry would constitute serious dangers."
The Inquisition, what a show.
The Inquisition, here we go.
Both the Nazis and the Communists used to accuse people of being homosexual to discredit them, as a propaganda tool. So JPII's experience had him inclined to view people accused of homosexuality as victims of a hideous smear campaign. How times have changed -- now telling people you're a homosexual is a sign of moral superiority. / sarcasm
They're also going to close the barn doors now that all the horses have escaped.
My impression is that the Catholic church is suffering from a pederast priest problem. Most victims are pubescent males. There may indeed be some small percentage of victims who are pre-pubescent, but the overwhelming majority are not prebies (prepubies?).
2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity...
We are told by the homophiles that homosexuals, because they are born that way, cannot (or should not) change. Just as alcoholics should not frequent bars, pederast priests should not be involved with oversight of young males. Even the Boy Scouts understand this.
Thanks for the further information.
No a homo-promo did not write this. It is the official text of the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Have a little respect.
I do not believe that not allowing a homosexual into the priesthood is unjust. As you said, you do not have a right to be a priest, it is a privelage that should be given to those most Holy and whose lives and souls closely mirror that of Christ's.
What do people want from the catholic church? They are trying to solve the problems that are currently going on in the Church. They have admonished the Bishop's responsible for the cover-ups, and now they are trying to weed out potential victimizer's.
Let us step back and look at the situation at hand. The children being assaulted are mostly boy's(teenage), and they are being assaulted by the priest's not the nun's. There is a real problem in the clergy when it comes to those with homosexual tendencies be it latent or outright.
You cannot argue that "celibacy" is the root cause of the assault's because as I said, the victim's are boy's assaulted by men, not girl's assaulted by men.
a newspaper with a significant number of homosexuals in their employ, the NYT, objects to the church purging homosexuals from the priesthood.
No wonder that homosexual denomination is advertising so much on TV.
Who wants to bet the "source" for the NYT is another homosexual.
the pedophiles WERE homosexuals.
In the priesthood, the homosexuals ARE the pedophiles.
Homosexuals do not belong in the priesthood in ANY capacity.
Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Catholic Discussion Ping List.
Vatican to Start U.S. Seminary Evaluations
Apostolic Seminary Visitation To Begin This Fall
U.S. Bishops to Begin Inspecting Seminaries
Prelate Says Gays Shouldn't Be Ordained
American overseeing Vatican evaluation of US seminaries says gays should not be ordained
As Cardinal, Benedict had already started pushing for this, as well as for a cleanup of the idiocy at some of the "Catholic" universities. Good News!
The problem here is the ambiguity of the word "homosexual." The Church teaches that homosexual acts ar alwsys immoral, but that a homosexual personality tendency is a disorder which leads to morally dangerous temptations, which the homosexual is morally obliged to reject.
Thus, people with a same-sex orientation deserve respect (just like people who struggle with any temptation); but they who PRACTICE perverted sex (the key word in the scripture quote) are condemned.
I think this pope sees homosexuality as a BEHAVIROR CHOICE and the PC police have been pushing the propaganda lie that homosexuality is "born" via some gene. (no science just propaganda BS)
Seems to be that he has cut through the spin is is looking to a real solution. The fact he is looking should also discourage homosexual advocates from looking to the priesthood as a job.
WOOHOOO!!! Go get 'em, Benedict!
"and for faculty members who dissent from church teaching" covers a broad spectrum of behavior.
All good points, but apparently you missed the humor in my post.
Absolutely. If you have the stomach for it, flip through one of their magazines or go to one of their websites. Their ENTIRE filthy culture centers around targeting youth and innocence.
"Goodbye, Good Men"
I mentioned this book to a priest the other day and he agreed with it. I was surprised at how matter-of-factly he stated it. He was ordained in 1990.
The 'sex-abuse' problem won't be solved till they sweep out the seminaries...
Can you read?
exactly. it is as simple as that. not only will the sex abuse problem be solved, but the priest shortage will miraculously be solved also.
you are absolutely incorrect. read the book. "Goodbye, Good Men." period.
Uh, most of the cases involved 15 and 16 year olds. That's not pedophilia. It is well documented that many seminaries are dominated by homosexuals. I had many "Father Liberaces" at my high school in my youth.