Here's an example. One of many. This one from Cambodia: 
Posted on 09/16/2005 8:42:42 PM PDT by kristinn
No free speech for anyone but themselves, typical Dims.
Hope you feel better soon.
Thanks for telling them where they can find us Pinkies!
Heh heh heh...
those darn freepers.... you scrub and scrub but you still can't get rid of them...
in my attendance to the double freep glorious weeks of outnumbering code pink ago... i noticed one of the code pinkies crossing the street and entering one of the rowhouse south of our corner... must be disturbing for her to have freedom less than a bloc away from where she lives.
teeman
ps- cops should be called every time they hang a banner... if they don't have the numbers to hold it, the taxpayers via the wrmc property shouldn't support their anti-support pieces of ****.
blessed be the dc freepers, they shall inherit the wrath of gall murphy.
Merely a more specific instance of "anti-war" = pro-war. "Anti-war" movements have always been warmongers, whether by conscious intent or air-headed fecklessness. In my lifetime, at any rate, they have always and only had the effect of making wars more likely, extending their length, and amplifying their misery.
The rosters of speakers at the "peace" rallies held in Washington, New York and San Francisco before the Iraq war were peppered with literal warmongers: representatives of (at least the "political wings" of) insurgency movements actively fighting wars in places like Columbia, Palestine/Israel, The Philippines, and attempting to foment insurgent war in many other places, e.g. Puerto Rico. No speaker who might oppose these wars -- wars waged against liberal or liberalizing democracies, or against governments friendly to the free world -- would be permitted to approach the microphone at these "peace" rallies. No speaker would ever think of asking the narco-terrorists of Columbia's FARC to put down their arms, let alone the mass-murdering insurgents fighting the democratically elected government of Iraq. In fact anyone supporting the peace process in Palestine (i.e. a two-state solution) was specifically prohibited from speaking at the "peace" rallies.
The "anti-war" crowd only appears to be specifically "pro-terror" because terrorism is a prominent tactic of the anti-democratic, anti-liberal, insurgent warriors and warmongers who they support. Don't be fooled, however, because they'll still support 'em if they jump into tanks and wage "conventional" war, and do still support 'em where they hold the power of the state, as in North Korea, Venezuela, Iraq under Saddam, and etc.
What it comes down to is that they hate -- and desire to see destroyed -- the free and liberal society because it falsifies their Utopian notions of "social justice".
:)
Should I bring discount coupons for soap to give to them or would that be too suggestive?
Here's an example. One of many. This one from Cambodia:
So basically Cindys friends and supporters financed Caseys murder. And since she is supporting them, then she herself is an accomplice after the fact. She should be haunted by her actions for the rest of her life.
I think they fear soap or dislike it rather than not have access to it. They are well-funded so maybe you could keep your coupons for someone who deserves consideration.
This is classic cultural marxism on display.
Indeed.
I came a little late and decided to walk on the Walter Reed side to get to the freeper protest. That meant I had to walk right through the Code Pink crowd. I figured I could just see their signs, say nothing, and slip over to the right side of the street (In every meaning of the word "right".)
However, I was wearing a "commies aren't cool" t-shirt, which featured a picture of Che with the line through it and the circle, suggesting that Che should be banned.
One of them asked if I was there to join them. She then saw my t-shirt and said "you're on the wrong side of the street." People started getting angry tones in their voice. One said "what's a commie?" That was bait for an argument, but I chose not to take it.
It's interesting they got so offended about a t-shirt that attacks a mass murderer like Che.
I guess it depends on who's firing squad your on ox is being gored.
Now this takes nerve. They are protesting against injured soldiers and they want the neighbors to protect them from Freepers and stiffle everyone elses freedom of speech. HOW SOCIALIST OF THEM
I would tend to disagree. While abortion is part of it, it's much larger than that. They have a vision, similar if not identical to that of such visionaries as Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Trotsky, of what they want society to become. The Constitution of the United States stands in the way of achieving that vision, if it is enforced. That's the prime job of the courts, particularly the appeals courts and the Supreme Court.
They haven't been able to even get much of their agenda passed by the people or their representatives but have gotten much of it passed by the courts, through distortion and outright reversal of the meanings of the provisions of the Constitution. If the Supreme Court and lower courts become staffed with those who would enforce the original meaning of the Constitution, the agenda of the Code Pinkos, MoveOn.orgs and their ilk will take major hits.
She has a husband? I'm amazed.
Thanks for all the information on Medea Benjamin. It sounds to me like she has an "enriched corporate backer" in her family connections that allow her to roam the world for all of her causes.
Sorry that I couldn't make it last night. The DC Chapter was awesome again. Thanks to all who made it, especially those who traveled so far.
Hope you are well rested by the 25th. Just a quick note to let you know that your package arrived. Thanks much.
Congratulations to you and your wife. See you next week.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.