To: syriacus; Crackingham
There is a constitutional right to privacy, he saidBut he did not say there was a constitutional right to kill defenseless humans.
No, he only said that we should respect the precedent of allowing the murder of defensless humans.
17 posted on
09/17/2005 6:42:55 AM PDT by
tame
(Why are CINOs so easily impressed with non-originalist "stealth" candidates like Roberts?)
To: tame
No, he only said that we should respect the precedent of allowing the murder of defensless humans. Precedents may deserve respect.
But do jurists have to enshrine and worship precedents like Sandra Day O'Connor did?....I don't think so.
The legacy of Sandra Day O'ConnorThere once was a justice named Sandy
Whose voice sounded sweet, just like candy.
Still, her mouth went and said,
"You can puncture its head!!
If a baby's not thought to be dandy."
22 posted on
09/17/2005 7:24:08 AM PDT by
syriacus
(To stay in power, Democrats need a MSM willing to lie about people + events + the constitution)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson