Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons
IN both of my dictionaries, one published in 1960, the other one, published in 1989, both have it at the sames place...in sixth position.

In what position is the definition of virgin as a man in the most recent edition?

Still number 6?

And what is the number 1 definition of virgin the most recent edition: still only a female?

The far flung assumption that you've thrown out, saying that for all YOU know ( and who are YOU anyway, but a biliously childish nobody, without any expertise whatsoever in words and word derivations ?), the use of the word VIRGIN, in connection with a man, in 1300 was a homosexual, absolutely ruins your protestations!

So let's see--

I lose my credibility by saying "for all I know"?

Well I guess a "biliously childish nobody' has no credibility.

583 posted on 09/20/2005 10:34:55 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies ]


To: Age of Reason
You've highjacked this thread, you obviously adore to be continuously humiliated in public, your attitude toward girls and females is not "traditional" ( as you attest it is ), nor is it Conservative in any way, and you appear to be incapable of using logic and engaging in debate.

In reply to your first query, I will only respond with another question.......WHICH DICTIONARY?

Do you know what a controlled test is?

585 posted on 09/20/2005 10:43:03 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson