Skip to comments.
Bill Clinton: No Basis to Attack Iraq
NewsMax ^
| 9/18/05
| NewsMax
Posted on 09/18/2005 10:56:31 AM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Well, BJ if you had been more concerned with terrorism than interns, maybe we wouldn't be in the situation we are now.
1
posted on
09/18/2005 10:56:34 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
"I didn't not favor what was done," Clinton said.
Is that a type-o? Or is that what he really said? That's vintage Klintoon.
2
posted on
09/18/2005 11:00:24 AM PDT
by
Cyclopean Squid
(Social Darwinism will claim me first.)
To: wagglebee
he lost opportunities to nail a major supplier of terrorism quite a few times in Sudan and elsewhere. He has no room to talk.
3
posted on
09/18/2005 11:01:29 AM PDT
by
ma bell
("Take me to the Brig. I want to see the "real Marines". Major General Chesty Puller, USMC)
To: wagglebee
Can someone tell me why we should pay ANY attention to this boob?? I mean seriously, if it weren't for him and Somalia, Al Quacks would never have gotten started! A$$holio. He is the one that let the Sanctions erode in Iraq in the 90's. He is more responsible for what is happening in the Middle East than this sophmoric statement leads one to believe.
I guess the Snake got to him and reminded him of what the Party's line is!
"It's all Bush's fault!"
And they wonder why we think they are loosers!
4
posted on
09/18/2005 11:01:33 AM PDT
by
Danae
( Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
To: wagglebee
no evidence that there was any weapons of mass destruction there," he [Clinton] complained to ABC's "This Week." "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 |
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
5
posted on
09/18/2005 11:01:59 AM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: wagglebee
MikeinIraq: No Basis to Believe Slick Willie
6
posted on
09/18/2005 11:03:09 AM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(Hey Fox News, MORE MOLLY, LESS Greta van Talksoutthesideofhermouth)
To: wagglebee
Please, anyone...we need a STFU graphic BAD.
7
posted on
09/18/2005 11:03:12 AM PDT
by
denydenydeny
("As a Muslim of course I am a terrorist"--Sheikh Omar Brooks, quoted in the London Times 8/7/05)
To: wagglebee
What the heck gives with these dam liberal Democrats, do they think they start with a clean slate every day. They say anything that comes to their minds and then later on they say something completely the opposite and we are expected to believe the latest and forget the past. I believe this is called "shooting from the hip", say what comes into your hollow head and keep right on going.
8
posted on
09/18/2005 11:03:13 AM PDT
by
depenzz
(My tastes are simple, I 'm always satisfied by the best)
To: wagglebee
The more Slick Willie opens his mouth, the more he sounds like Jimmah Cahtuh. I guess his mistress in Chappaqua isn't keeping him busy.
9
posted on
09/18/2005 11:03:22 AM PDT
by
billnaz
(What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?)
To: wagglebee
"no evidence that there was any weapons of mass destruction there"
I remember him saying the exact opposite a year or two ago, this guy is lying through his teeth but what else is new.
To: denydenydeny
Hey BJ...
11
posted on
09/18/2005 11:04:57 AM PDT
by
itsamelman
(“Announcing your plans is a good way to hear God laugh.” -- Al Swearengen)
To: wagglebee
He did not have a reason to attack those women either, did he?
12
posted on
09/18/2005 11:05:07 AM PDT
by
Piquaboy
(22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
To: denydenydeny
13
posted on
09/18/2005 11:05:35 AM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
To: Mr. Mojo
I guess Clinton's interviewer today on "This Week" was prepared and brought up these quotes to Clinton.
(STOP LAUGHING!!!)
14
posted on
09/18/2005 11:06:01 AM PDT
by
gg188
To: itsamelman
15
posted on
09/18/2005 11:06:03 AM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
To: wagglebee
I guess he believes that the only reason to attack Iraq is if the House of Representatives is about to vote to impeach you, and by commencing aerial bombardment of Baghdad you can get Democrats to press for postponement of the vote until the next session when more Democrats will be seated in the House, on the grounds that Americans must show support for President and for our troops who are in harm's way.
16
posted on
09/18/2005 11:07:30 AM PDT
by
Maceman
(Pro Se Defendant from Hell)
To: wagglebee
Amazing.
As of say, June 2000, the Sink Emporer had made public statements outlining how Iraq had failed to comply with the treaty which ended the First Gulf War.
Our planes were being shot at. American planes had bombed Baghdad.
He just lacked the courage to act, knowing that he could postpone the problem into some other president's term.
A walking talking bag of lying egomaniac scum.
17
posted on
09/18/2005 11:07:50 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: wagglebee
"Contradicting his previous statements....."Kinda sums up the entire filthy existence of both him and The Former Twelfth Lady.
To: wagglebee
Are we seeing the Carterization of Clinton?
To: wagglebee
Clinton had no reason to attack Yugoslavia.
20
posted on
09/18/2005 11:08:33 AM PDT
by
just me
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson