To: snarks_when_bored
"Uh, yes...but not all at once."
Then why do even very simple forms of life such as viruses and bacteria use the same complex code? Shouldn't there be some earlier, simpler forms of the code still extant?
To: Ninian Dryhope
"Uh, yes...but not all at once." Then why do even very simple forms of life such as viruses and bacteria use the same complex code? Shouldn't there be some earlier, simpler forms of the code still extant?
Those forms have disappeared, victims of adverse circumstances to which they could not stand up. What we see now (and in the fossil record, such as it is) are the winners (at least for a time). It seems that a certain degree of complexity in their molecular structure is required for types of organisms to persist over long periods of time.
To: Ninian Dryhope
"Then why do even very simple forms of life such as viruses and bacteria use the same complex code? Shouldn't there be some earlier, simpler forms of the code still extant?" After 3.5 billion years? Why would they?
117 posted on
09/19/2005 9:57:03 AM PDT by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson