Replies

"If the guy says it is scientific, why is he romantic about Darwin and don't show facts and logic? The author is talking about Darwinism, an ideology, he is not talking about Darwin and the science itself."

Could it be that Darwin is a "god"?

"This is the big cult of repent to entitled scientists indoctrination trick. "

Could it be the base of the entitlement era??

"And as for criticizing revelation, what does this have to do with Darwin? God is a revealed person. We know Him because we know what He will do. Science is about knowing what happened in the past and projecting it in the future into gizmos. They are two different independent concepts which do not necessarily exclude each other."

One cannot ignore at its base evolution rejects the Creator, thus they are 'gods'.

"The author is not promoting science but a cult of repent to the likes of him, and he cannot see that coz he does not know God nor himself and his own unethical conflict of interests to discuss the matter.

In other words, those who do not trust him are liberaly labeled and "romanticized" as people needing some form of mental incarceration he himself in fact needs and is blackmailing sensical good people against."

Well there is at least one word from Genesis the evolutionists do adhere to and use liberally and that word is "DOMINION". Seems there is a connection in how this word evolution is applied not only to the flesh body but to the mind, those liberals do call the Constitution a living evolving document.

StPaul talked about us needing to match the faith of the working ant. Jesus talked about the quasi-static growth of a plant when talking of growing spirit and spreading the word or doing anything.

So, obviously the Bible does hint at evolution, but with faith and a Creator stilting patiently and wisely those things in His own ways. Evolution by itself is Babelian miscommunication or the type of butchery that occured as a result of wanting to be as gods, blackmailing God's love.

Well there is at least one word from Genesis the evolutionists do adhere to and use liberally and that word is "DOMINION". Seems there is a connection in how this word evolution is applied not only to the flesh body but to the mind, those liberals do call the Constitution a living evolving document

They treat the constitution as if man or the world evolved in such virtues that it did not need "backward stoneage" guidelines. Truth is different. Modernity has created more savagery than ever in man and the constitutions and the founders had predicted that democracy would be used and confused into a tool to recruit troops to a party promising free loot and rape to adherants. The muslim Turks used this technique to democraticaly motivate troop invasions of Europe saying raping infidels was good thing.

Those for the "evolving constitution" constantly ignore the predictions and valid disclaimers of the Founding Fathers, and instead reject them and bring their own progressist disclaimers. God provided for many disclaimers to whatever covenant that are still valid ages later. These people are into another cult which wants to avoid these, yet claiming to be part of a "disclaimant" group, which they are not. They are part of a "no disclaimer" progressism group on looting for political gain - threats, terrorism and blackmail, that is, in nicely worded accademic "higher" language.

One cannot ignore at its base evolution rejects the Creator, thus they are 'gods'.

Utterly and completely false, in *two* different ways in a single setence.

Just once I wish you anti-evolution zealots would try to *understand* the topic and its adherents before you go spouting off your wild fantasies about it.