[Dimensio]

And Evo argues "chance" as a default position.

No, no it doesn't. If you'd actually studied evolution -- the real science, not the strawman characterization presented by creationist shills -- you would understand this.

No Johnson is not a scientist, but his book is well documented. uses sound logic and reasoning, and pretty much throws a monkey wrench into Darwinsism....so to speak.

But if he doesn't understand the underlying science -- and there's every indication that he doesn't -- then his arguments are based upon faulty premises and, as such, have no validity.

But, I don't expect any of the evo devo..tees to ever read it. Oh well...

Many of us have read it. That's how we know that it's a load of garbage. But, of course, creationists ignore facts not convenient for them.

I don't ask that ID be taught in schools, I ask that Darwinsim be treated like any other theory and be open to criticism.

It is, in the same way that we hold gravity theory, atomic theory and electromagnetic theory to "criticism". Unfortunately, many of the "criticism" layed against it is founded upon faulty premises and a poor grasp of science.

[fizziwig]

"That's how we know that it's a load of garbage"

The entire book is garbage eh? How about an example of something he has contended that you believe is garbage, and why you believe it is garbage other than the fact that you disagree with him?

The book is not garbage and Johnson is no fool....the fact is he has evo on the ropes and they are unable to effectively counter him...

[Elsie]

-- you would understand this.

And quit LYING about it!!!

--EvoDude