What indeed?
gobucks, I read the TNR article you posted 3 times through, trying to work out for the life of me how this piece says anything which isn't utterly damning to the case you generally make in these threads--but nope, just couldn't see it.
I have now tried, also 3 times, to follow your argument in your posted reply to jennyp--but nope again, I just can't follow your reasoning here at all. I pretty much lose you somewhere around the 'shows like South Park are all the rage' part.
You appear to be claiming some sort of elaborate 'entryism' into the GOP by--well, by whom exactly is one of the things I honestly can't work out from your posting. My best guess is that "the 'conservative' Christian-haters" are meant.
As a conservative, as a Christian, and as one persuaded by the scientific arguments of Darwinian evolutionary theory, I would probably find both the characterisation and the allegation here objectional--except that it is not even intelligible
You appear to be claiming some sort of elaborate 'entryism' into the GOP by--well, by whom exactly is one of the things I honestly can't work out from your posting. My best guess is that "the 'conservative' Christian-haters" are meant.
Close - I just wouldn't call them conservative. I would call them 'deliberately false-flagged-conservatives'. But, how is this confusing? How is it not obvious? This thread already provides total PROOF of what I am stating...
TNR if filled chock full w/ looney leftists. But, amazingly, the 'rightists' evo types here at FR LOVE this article!! Patrick 'song-in-my-heart' Henry is nearly drooling!!!! Somebody help me here....; SeaLion has read it 3 times, and still doesn't get it...