Funny, there used to be a concept we are all equal under the law. Under democrat's seems some are to be more equal then others.
ping
Cripes. Hard to believe this crap reaches his desk.
Assemblyman Alberto Torrico, D-Fremont, said his bill was not aimed at illegal immigrants, but...
----
There are so many radical libs trying to capitalize on the runaway presence of ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS in this country, it is sickening. And for the most part, they continue to get away with the insanity.
November, 2006 can't come soon enough for me!
I just hope people will come forward to run against these clowns!
Good grief!
And, of course, use the motor/voter provisions.
Try insuring a vehicle if owner does not have a valid Ca license - it not done. Insurance Companies will not insure and will cancel or non renew or exclude driver if license is not valid. That's why you have so many uninsured motorist.
Cars should be towed if valid proof of insurance and driver does not hold valid license. Unless it clearly identifies the non-citizen (i.e.illegal)they are not entitled to one. Why should they get a break. You break the laws, you should pay the penalties.
Our Palestinian problem.
Of course not. That's why the phrase "illegal immigrant" is in the bill.
How stupid do they think we are?
Typical included is a $75/day (or more) impound fee.
It amounts to car confiscation for the old POS cars these people typically drive. Does'nt bother the illegals much. The tow fee was more then their cars are usually worth. They're replacing the car with another '85 chevette the next day.
As to the parents whos kids are joy riding. I'd give em a choice: Charge your little darling with car theft and get the car back OR lose the car for 30 days and pay the extortion.
If they hurt or kill someone and you know they're driving your car, the police should arrest you.
It seems to make sense to me. If the driver is not the owner, the vehicle shouldn't be impounded. That only punishes the owner and does not punish the driver. The impounding should be a punishment for an owner-driver. Non-owner drivers need to be arrested for driving without a liscence (or insurance) and should serve an appropriate term in jail. For example, what if the vehicle in question was a rental and driven by someone who didn't rent it? Should the car be taken from the rental company as punishment without wrongdoing?
Another whatda-f? Law!~}
The statists love their confiscation laws
If a gun owner is subject to penalties for leaving a firearm where a kid can get it, why not the same for his car?
Keys and telephones!
Keys are to lock your car from unauthorized use and telephones are for calling the police to report it stolen.
If you are too dumb, lazy or lax to secure the keys and too liberal with your children to call the cops on them if they steal (or use your car without permission), or worse yet, not report your car stolen...YOU GET WHAT YOU DESERVE.