Tax Breaks for Katrina May Aid Rich More (Socialist commentary in "AP news")

WASHINGTON - House and Senate tax writers agreed Tuesday on a package of tax breaks designed to help Hurricane Katrina victims recoup their losses and access needed cash.

The Congressional Research Service, an office that provides lawmakers with nonpartisan legislative analysis, said some of those tax breaks could do more for higher income survivors than for the neediest.

The tax bill is one avenue lawmakers have pursued in sending relief to hurricane evacuees. Since Katrina hit the Gulf Coast in late August, Congress has approved $62 billion in emergency spending and promised more.

House and Senate lawmakers debated Tuesday whether some costs for cleaning up after Katrina should be defrayed by cutting fat elsewhere in the federal budget.

Lawmakers weighed the idea as President Bush made his fifth visit to the devastated Gulf Coast and received a briefing about Hurricane Rita, which lashed the Florida Keys and caused a flurry of storm preparations through the Gulf Coast to Texas. The Army Corps of Engineers raced to patch New Orleans' damaged levee system ahead of the storm.

Acting Federal Emergency Management Agency Director R. David Paulison told reporters that Rita was expected to reach Category 3 or 4 levels. FEMA had aircraft and buses available to evacuate residents from areas the hurricane might hit.

"I strongly urge Gulf Coast residents to pay attention" to the storm, Paulison said.

House and Senate tax writers, meanwhile, agreed on a tax bill that helps Katrina victims access their savings by waiving penalties imposed for tapping retirement savings accounts before retirement. Other provisions let taxpayers write off more of their destroyed property and erase taxes regularly imposed when a debt, like a mortgage, is forgiven.

The bill, which lawmakers expect to pass quickly, will include a two-year tax credit for businesses hiring people within the disaster area. Those who take in evacuees, other than family members, would be eligible for a $500 personal exemption.

The Congressional Research Service report said some elements of the tax assistance would do more for wealthier taxpayers because many lower income individuals and families pay little tax. Lower income survivors are also less likely to have retirement accounts like 401(k)s and IRAs.

However, the same tax measure includes assistance specifically for lower-income families that would help the working poor hang onto their income tax credits, which can be disrupted by unemployment or family separation.

Lawmakers moved ahead with the tax assistance while debating spending restraints. Senior Republicans, even those supporting tight reins on spending, said it could prove difficult to find budget cuts with the majority support necessary to succeed.

"As many members of the Senate as there are, there's that many different views of how you do offsets," said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Judd Gregg, R-N.H. "That's why it will be hard to do."

One example is the upcoming rollout of the Medicare prescription drug benefit, passed two years ago. Some conservative lawmakers have suggested delaying it to buffer Katrina's effect on the budget.

White House budget director Joshua Bolten briefed senators on Katrina response efforts. He renewed the office's commitment to a plan by congressional Republicans to curb growth in federal benefit programs like Medicaid by $35 billion.

House Democratic leaders called for an independent panel to oversee the awarding of Katrina contracts for hurricane cleanup, citing a need to ensure taxpayer dollars are doled out fairly.

The House, meanwhile, voted 400-0 to give the Labor Department greater leeway in running a jobs program for people affected by national emergencies.

The bill would expand the National Emergency Grant program, under which the Labor Department has already awarded $191 million to support 40,000 temporary jobs for those displaced by Katrina. The program provides up to six months of job training or work related to assisting victims.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Charles Boustany, R-La., would extend the program to areas outside the immediate disaster area to help people who relocated elsewhere.

The House also approved, by voice vote, legislation to extend for two years a program through which the secretary of education can waive student loan payments for reservists or National Guard members called to active duty.

This article is currently a headline on Yahoo's site. Of course, the title has nothing to with the legislation. The tax breaks will be awarded to any business that hires people affected by the disaster area. I guess this automatically means "the rich."

Businesses can now invest more and thrive with the tax cuts and people who lost their jobs can now find work.

The liberals and MSM that trumpets their cause are truly narcissistic. Thier solutions always mean taxing out all individual wealth, creating the socialist nanny state where all people must depend on the government, and in the end destroying all of society. Socialism is actually anti-society.

All these Marxist ideas were tried in the Soviet Union, Mao's China, Cuba, North Korea, Rumania and the results were a complete disaster. Have liberals not learned the greatest lesson of the 20th century: that Marxism is complete failure?

Hey I've got an idea. Some of these disaster survivors could be sitting on as much as, what a couple hundred grand? Nobody needs that much money to survive when some people have none. We'll just take all the income over $30k and put it in a big pot. Hillary and Howard Dean will be in charge of doling it back out to the little people based on how bad their great-great-great grandparents had it 1792--minus a 90% bureacratic redistribution fee.

Stop me when this starts to sound too much like the actual Democratic Party.

I love this type of critisim.

You can't give a tax break to someone who doesn't pay taxes, so a tax break always is slanted towards those who pay more money. What they are arguing for is government handouts.

How do we rebuild a city? Maybe encourage businesses to come back? Without strong businesses, the city will remain poor. If you give an incentive to those with money to build businesses via lower taxes, tax credits and easy access to capital, maybe the new city could be prosperous and everyone will benefit with good jobs, growing property values, increased productivity etc. It really does take capital and nohow to build business. If I were a gambling man, I would bet the people with money are more likely to make this happen than those without money.

If you just give handouts to the poor, all you have is a short term fix and the poor are still poor, very few new jobs will be created to give sustaining incomes to those who are poor and there will be a negative drain on the rebuilding of the city.

I know the concept is novel, but to make a rebuilt New Orleans succeed, you need to build a society that can sustain itself.

Handouts are simply costly with very little long term benefit. I don't intend to be callous, I do understand that those who could not afford insurance need assistance, but that is what private charities are for. Private charities are better at determining people's needs and getting assistance to those who need it. The government, local and federal, are better used to encourage long term economic prosperity.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.