[editor-surveyor]

Tu chai pi's creation story is obviously lacking. The earth was already there when he started, so just what does he claim to have created?

Also, does his writing contain all the interlaced numeric proof of authenticity that the real creator placed in his word?

[Coyoteman]

Tu chai pi's creation story is obviously lacking. The earth was already there when he started, so just what does he claim to have created?

Also, does his writing contain all the interlaced numeric proof of authenticity that the real creator placed in his word?

Thank you for helping to illustrate the point I am trying to make with the creation stories I post.

The most common reaction I get is the equivalent of "that's not the creation I meant!"

Your comment, if you'll pardon the paraphrase, is "My creation story is better than your creation story." This is similar.

What these reactions illustrate is that the ID folks do not want intelligent design in all its breadth and detail (such as the Native American creation stories). Rather, ID is a device to get a particular creation story (the bible) into classrooms.

Thank you for helping me illustrate this.