To: mewzilla
Some of it is driving habits. Proper tire inflation is another. Load is still another. Weather conditions. Type of roadway driven. The cars are tested with a driver, new engine, perfectly inflated tires, on perfect roadway in perfect weather conditions. So yeah, mileage might be a lot lower for John Q. Public.Can't speak for others' driving habits, but I drive briskly, and I believe in the "over 9, pay the fine rule" (that is, I drive about 8 mph over the speed limit in most places). Terrain around here is very hilly, borderline mountainous. It's part of my every-day driving.
The new engine used in the EPA test should get worse mileage than one that has a few thousand miles on it - that's been my experience anyway. As for tire inflation, that is a significant factor, but you'd have to be running at about 10 PSI to get the results that CR got. I'm not very trusting of the EPA in general, but I'm even less trusting of Consumer Reports. The friend of Nader is my natural enemy, and I believe that they have alterior motives whenever they touch a car.
45 posted on
09/22/2005 7:55:29 AM PDT by
meyer
(The DNC prefers advancing the party at the expense of human lives.)
To: meyer
Well, FWIW, we drive compacts and the mileage has always been a couple of miles within the advertised. I suspect the problem is mainly with the gas guzzlers, and we wouldn't buy one of those anyway :) In any case, it's still buyer beware, though folks who don't keep their cars well-maintained are shooting themselves in the foot. Can't blame Detroit for that.
59 posted on
09/22/2005 9:15:08 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson