Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cindy Launches Million Dollar Ad Campaign
Sweetness & Light ^ | September 22, 2005 | N/A

Posted on 09/22/2005 8:43:14 AM PDT by Sam Hill

From the back pages of the St. Paul Pioneer Press:

Photo

Posted on Thu, Sep. 22, 2005

Ad campaign faults Iraq war

"They lied, they died," proclaims a nationwide ad campaign against the war in Iraq that is being launched today in newspapers and on television.

The $1 million campaign involves double-page print ads in 14 newspapers, including the Minneapolis-based Star Tribune. The television spots are being carried nationwide on CNN.

Both ads are sponsored by Gold Star Families for Peace, an organization co-founded by Cindy Sheehan, the California mother of a slain soldier who camped outside President Bush's Crawford, Texas, ranch during his summer vacation. Another sponsor is Win Without War, an organization founded by Tom Andrews, a former Democratic congressman from Maine.

Under a "They lied, they died" headline, the newspaper ad juxtaposes statements by Bush administration officials about the reasons for undertaking the war with a list of the names of the more than 1,900 military personnel who have died.

The newspaper ad asks supporters to send a donation to Win Without War.

Perhaps if Mother Sheehan had raised more money under the guise of Katrina relief she would have been able to add these quotes from Democrat officials as well:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." -- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." -- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." -- Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." -- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

"I think Iraq is the most serious and imminent threat to our country ... And I think Iraq and Saddam Hussein present the most serious and most imminent threat." -- John Edwards (D, NC), February 24, 2002.



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cindysheehan; katrina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: Sam Hill

I was wondering who was behind this ad. The Left is such an incredible bunch of hypocrites. They complain about the wealthy buying influence, but they cheer one flummoxed man, Mr. Soros, when he spends part of his billions trying to influence American foreign policy.


21 posted on 09/22/2005 9:12:32 AM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
To take a page out of Bette Midler's book I say - "Cindy, go F*^%% yourself."
22 posted on 09/22/2005 9:13:22 AM PDT by veronica ("America has been killing people on this continent since it was started." - Mother Sheehan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

I wonder how much money raised under the pretext of "Katrina relief funds" is going to her campaign against the Iraq war??? She and her supporting organizations need to be rigorously audited -- judging from the VFP fiascos in Louisiana, it's hard to believe they have been the least bit scrupulous about using fundraising for its stated purposes, etc.


23 posted on 09/22/2005 9:15:57 AM PDT by Enchante (Would you trust YOUR life to Mayor Nagin or Governor Blankhead?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthingod

Effective in swaying people that can't think for themselves except in short sound-bites. Think "sheeple", i.e. the gullible followers. Unfortunately, there are more of them than there are of us.


24 posted on 09/22/2005 9:19:31 AM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I was thinking the same thing.....something looks weird about her.


25 posted on 09/22/2005 9:24:50 AM PDT by goodnesswins (DEMS....40 years and $$$dollars for the War on Poverty, but NOT a minute for the WAR on Terror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Who wants to bet some of the money is coming from Hillary backers?


26 posted on 09/22/2005 9:25:10 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

Rush just announced that Hitlery will now meet with Sheehan and for some unexplained reason, so will John McCain.


27 posted on 09/22/2005 9:28:21 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because the U.S. was too strong." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lauretij2

Some tired cliches the liberal pacifists use every year.

"No blood for oil!"
"xxxxxxx lied, people died"
"Halliburton"
"Cheney"
"Rove"


28 posted on 09/22/2005 9:29:00 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
What a ugly stupid, lying, stealing woman.

If she cares so much for the so called freedom fighters, she should travel to Iraq to meet with them in person.
29 posted on 09/22/2005 9:29:50 AM PDT by tarzantheapeman (Cindy and the Cranks - Moonbats Gone Wild!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

It would be great to made a video/CD montage with all these DEM quotes/statements and send to all our GOP and DEMS to remind them. Would make a great TV Ad to counter these Kooks Great post highlighting quotes


30 posted on 09/22/2005 9:31:07 AM PDT by newfrpr04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Cindy who?


31 posted on 09/22/2005 9:33:25 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

She got that girlish valley girl voice with the masculine body. It terrible to see grown adults making fools of themselves. She is pretty manly looking


32 posted on 09/22/2005 9:35:05 AM PDT by newfrpr04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill



Think of all the poor people or Hurricane Victims who could be fed with this money. Shame on Sindy.


33 posted on 09/22/2005 9:36:03 AM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Again, the DemocRATs and PeaceNUTniks can't come up with an original idea. They are trying to copy the Swit Vets successful ads and it won't happen. Why? Because THIS time:

There is a counter weight to the OLD MEDIA called right talk radio.

There are many who lived through the Vietnam War and what happened to our troops by men like Kerry.

We are not being silent..we are countering the NUTcases at every stop even if the media doesn't report it.

The movement isn't getting any backing my middle Americans

They are having to lie to get people to their protests (by calling and saying it is a "Support the Troops" rally). How dispicable.

There is the internet and e-mail now. The truth gets out.

No more Rather, Cronkites, Jennings to carry their message.
(but they still have soft newsers like Kommie Katie, Oprah, and the VIEW)

Web sites like FreeRepublic


34 posted on 09/22/2005 9:37:40 AM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
...and for some unexplained reason, so will John McCain.

Is there going to be a TV camera? So the reason isn't "unexplained" anymore, right?

35 posted on 09/22/2005 9:39:11 AM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: guido911

When one thinks about it, these pictures are very interesting. Somewhere in those pictures is the future john f'n kerry or worse. Don't know if that is a sobering thought or makes me want to take a fifth home from the package store.


36 posted on 09/22/2005 9:40:15 AM PDT by rock58seg ("Guest Workers," W's version of, "Read my lips." Secure our borders!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: randog

Agreed. The commercial seemed effective and might influence someone on the fence. Wish that we could have as moving a commercial on our side as that one was able to ping the heartstrings and confuse the intellectual issues.


37 posted on 09/22/2005 9:46:32 AM PDT by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rock58seg

Well thanks for that thought. I prefer option B


38 posted on 09/22/2005 9:54:26 AM PDT by guido911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: billnaz

It`s pathetic isn`t it? I heard her relatives came out to speak out against her, but she`s so drunk on the attention she ignores them. I tell you, I truly think this woman went nuts. When she met with Bush she was never like this, then suddenly she lost it.


39 posted on 09/22/2005 9:55:07 AM PDT by WillamShakespeare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Geez, is it just me, or is she beginning to look like John Denver?


40 posted on 09/22/2005 9:56:26 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson