The 60's were in this lifetime, at least for a great many of us.
Suppose your property is taken from you and given to another person. Then that other person "sells" it to his son (wink, wink). I'd say you're justified in reclaiming it.
The type of reparations that we should oppose are when one "group" takes from another "group" with no legal basis.
But this case is one of individuals making a claim to property their family owned. This is closer to fighting eminent domain abuse.
I wonder where people here would stand if the Molamus were
white?
I think its salutory that the SA government is being scupulous in its dealings with the Vissers and would hope
that freepers would support justice without regard to the
race of the parties.
But the white farmer should be fairly compensated. This is half what he asked for, and ignores improvement on the property that he made.
Do you understand the precedent? You cant take and under compensate. You start there, and theres no bottom. What happened in the past was done legally, if not morally, and if you want to start a huge white flight, just pretend that the only thing that make right, is might. That'll do it.