To: gobucks
The trouble with Darwin is that all his sychophant followers can't prove his theory because Macro-Evolution never happened. One of the few instances still remaining in history in which blind and deluded followers who know it is only theory continue to treat the subject as de facto science. Bbbbwwwaahhhhaaaaaaa!
120 posted on
09/24/2005 5:05:18 PM PDT by
Doc Savage
(...because they stand on a wall, and they say nothing is going to hurt you tonight, not on my watch!)
To: Doc Savage
"The trouble with Darwin is that all his sychophant followers can't prove his theory because Macro-Evolution never happened."
Name ONE scientific theory that has been proved. Science is about evidence, not proof.
122 posted on
09/24/2005 5:07:18 PM PDT by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
To: Doc Savage
The trouble with Darwin is that all his sychophant followers can't prove his theory because Macro-Evolution never happened.Macroevolution is evolution at or above the species level. Microevolution is evolution below the species level. If a new species come into being then that is macroevolution by definition. Since the emergence of new species has been observed, or can be securely infered, in multiple instances, we actually know that macroevolution happens.
126 posted on
09/24/2005 5:13:08 PM PDT by
Stultis
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson