Sure glad to hear they've allotted for avoiding space debris! <>g<> You ingenues ready to try for that 50 grand prize?
1 posted on
09/25/2005 3:32:50 PM PDT by
Grendel9
To: Grendel9
2 posted on
09/25/2005 3:37:00 PM PDT by
satchmodog9
(Murder and weather are our only news)
To: Grendel9
... three-feet across but just half the width of a pencil. ... That's a fat pencil!
To: Grendel9
4 posted on
09/25/2005 3:39:38 PM PDT by
Charles Henrickson
(Going UPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: Grendel9
I'd hate to be in it during a power failure.
To: Grendel9
I'm not interested til they get a casino on the moon...Talk about a boring vacation...May as well just hang out in the back yard...At least there's some shade there...
7 posted on
09/25/2005 4:18:59 PM PDT by
Iscool
To: Grendel9
Wait 'til a muslim flies into it... Mama Mia!
8 posted on
09/25/2005 4:31:47 PM PDT by
hang 'em
(Half the human race is either crazy or stupid.)
To: Grendel9
> That would open up the possibility of tourists ...
We can hardly imagine what it will open up.
Nuclear power for one. Radwaste (and severe hazmats
generally) would no longer be a problem - just run 'em
up the rope and let 'em loose when their arc takes them
right into the Sun.
Another - global warming - if it's real, we can put
huge thin sun shades in between the Earth and Sun, at
one of the Lagrangian points.
To: Grendel9
If they construct this thing, that means "The Man" will have a significant amount of control over who does and does not go into space. Personally, I'd rather our resources instead go towards developing more efficient rocket designs.
13 posted on
09/25/2005 4:57:47 PM PDT by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: Grendel9
15 posted on
09/25/2005 5:06:57 PM PDT by
Tribune7
To: Grendel9
Didn't they try this before...in Babel?
18 posted on
09/25/2005 5:14:42 PM PDT by
Palladin
(America! America! God shed His grace on Thee.)
To: Grendel9
I'm tellin' ya, nanotechnology is where EVERYTHING is going.
To: KevinDavis
27 posted on
09/25/2005 6:48:33 PM PDT by
solitas
(So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.2)
To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; ...
34 posted on
09/25/2005 7:43:01 PM PDT by
KevinDavis
(the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
To: Grendel9
Space debris is the Achilles heal of this thing. Since the thing will have to extend beyond geosync in order to counterbalance it, every satellite lower than perhaps 30k miles WILL hit it some day. Every one of them. I'd bet it would have a strike a day.
Between the work to remove every significant chunk of space debris, and the launches to put the first elevator in operation, a space elevator is a non-starter.
The way to go to space is a turbine/ram/scram/rocket aircraft that can fly literally every day with only fuel required. Such an aircraft CAN be built with existing technology if we get at it instead of fooling around doing Apollo 2.0. Granted, it will not have heavy lift capability, but large structures can be launched with throw away boosters until we get space manufacturing in place.
Apollo 2.0 and space elevator talk only distract us from what is doable.
36 posted on
09/25/2005 7:56:24 PM PDT by
narby
To: Grendel9
I've done "Stairway to Heaven" on Christmas Eve in Cambodia!
37 posted on
09/25/2005 8:37:05 PM PDT by
MarineBrat
(When it rains, New Orleans makes its own gravy.)
To: Grendel9
43 posted on
09/28/2005 1:32:03 PM PDT by
JackDanielsOldNo7
(If it wasn't for marriage, I would not have this screenname.)
To: Grendel9
Think I'll take the stairs, thanks.
To: Grendel9
Cool! Hey, mike- maybe you'll finally be able to reach Uranus!
49 posted on
09/29/2005 4:56:22 AM PDT by
ovrtaxt
(PURVEYOR OF POPULIST HYPERBOLE AND RHETORIC.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson