[beckysueb]

Which is what I like to tell liberals these days: You thought Bush was such a dummy, but if that's true, what does that say about Kerry who couldn't beat him in the election? If Kerry was so good he should have won, and won SOUNDLY.

I honestly think the Clintons were behind Kerry getting the nomination. They didn't want a democrat president cause it would mean Hillary would have to wait till 2012 to run. She felt her best chances were in 08. They deliberately picked Kerry to ensure a Bush win. But the dem poll workers and operatives didn't get the message and cheated for Kerry big time. I bet if every vote had been a legal vote and correctly counted, Bush would have won by a landslide. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if the Clintons actually voted for Bush.

[raccoonradio]

>>They deliberately picked Kerry to ensure a Bush win

have heard that theory before, too...she couldn't beat W
running for re-election so she could just wait for '08
and let Kerry take the fall.

[dubyawhoiluv]

This is a beast hillary plant, the clintons' knew he would lose and attempt a comeback in 2008. They took out Dean with those Canadian tapes; 200 tapes were reviewed by his staff, one was missing and of course it was the tape that had him calling Iowans dumb and their primary and N.H.'s were useless.