Skip to comments.
Rather: Bush Guard Memo Story "Accurate,"
Never Proven Not So
http://www.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2005/cyb20050927.asp#1 ^
Posted on 09/27/2005 5:10:42 PM PDT by NCjim
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
1
posted on
09/27/2005 5:10:43 PM PDT
by
NCjim
To: NCjim
First of all, it ["courage"] was my father's favorite word. My mother's favorite word was "meadow". Yeah, OK, if those are my choices, I could go with "courage".
2
posted on
09/27/2005 5:13:31 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: NCjim
In an interview with Marvin Kalb carried live by C-SPAN from the National Press Club on Monday night, Dan Rather made quite clear that he believes in the accuracy of his Bush National Guard story based on what everyone else realizes were fabricated memos. Rather argued that "one supporting pillar of the story, albeit an important one, one supporting pillar was brought into question. Quite frankly, Dan Rather is insane. He cannot admit the falsity of his story. Dan, De-Nial is not just a river in Egypt!
3
posted on
09/27/2005 5:14:48 PM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: NCjim
We had a story, you can argue that we shouldn't have, might of, could of, shouldn't have handled during political camp-, but they understood that what we reported as the central facts of the story and there were new insights into the President's, were correct and to this day, by the way have not been denied which is always the test of whether-. They understood that on the documents, as I said once, I wish we had done it better. There's a pony under there somewhere!
4
posted on
09/27/2005 5:16:02 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: NCjim
Quit digging, Dan. . Bounce those little Rather Grandchildren on your knee, Dan. Find some joy. Go, enjoy your retirement
The glory days are long over and you are completely irrelevant. No amount of yammering will change that.
To: NCjim
"Yes, there's some strange and, to me, still mysterious things, certainly unexplained things about how it got attacked and why even before the program is over, but I try not to bog down in it."
Oh, indeed. It's indeed "mysterious" how those evil, "hyperconservative" numskulls evidently have more brain cells than the entire news division at CBS.
To: Mo1
Ping. You'll enjoy this.
Proving a negative is impossible, but they know that.
7
posted on
09/27/2005 5:16:44 PM PDT
by
Jean S
To: pollyannaish
Just two old lady hippies shootin the breeze huh???
8
posted on
09/27/2005 5:16:47 PM PDT
by
samadams2000
(Nothing fills the void of a passing hurricane better than government)
To: NCjim
The way Rush put it today was: "the guy was dead when he wrote the memo"
9
posted on
09/27/2005 5:17:18 PM PDT
by
uncitizen
To: NCjim
He might as well give it up. Nobody cares except those with tin foil hats on.
Besides, Bush isn't running for anything.
10
posted on
09/27/2005 5:17:22 PM PDT
by
BMC1
To: NCjim
Dan Rather never proved that his mother was not a prostitute either.
11
posted on
09/27/2005 5:17:46 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
To: NCjim
you need to lay off the Ensure Can there Dan Rather... lmao
12
posted on
09/27/2005 5:18:19 PM PDT
by
Cinnamon
To: NCjim
Dan Rather: "Once I thought I was wrong but I was mistaken".
13
posted on
09/27/2005 5:19:06 PM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
To: NCjim
Absolutely amazing. This rube is still spouting the 'fake but accurate' mantra. And I see he's still delusional as ever.
To: NCjim
15
posted on
09/27/2005 5:20:51 PM PDT
by
mylife
(The roar of the masses could be farts)
To: samadams2000
LOL. There are certain Baby Boomers who believed they would never get old and irrelevant.
Surprise!
(For the record, the rest of you Baby Boomers where smart, just not as loud.)
To: NCjim; All
17
posted on
09/27/2005 5:21:44 PM PDT
by
dighton
To: NCjim
"Rather argued that "one supporting pillar of the story, albeit an important one, one supporting pillar was brought into question."
In terms of Engineering, one questionable supporting pillar will get the building condemned.
18
posted on
09/27/2005 5:21:52 PM PDT
by
roaddog727
(P=3/8 A. or, P=plenty...............)
To: NCjim
Just saying it to be so, hoping it to be so, and believing it to be so, does not make it so. The facts point that out clearly. But Rather cannot see clearly, because he is blinded by partisanship. What a sorry old man!
19
posted on
09/27/2005 5:22:48 PM PDT
by
rawhide
To: pollyannaish
Hey I like your home page Frankl quote! Gonna have to remember that.
20
posted on
09/27/2005 5:23:24 PM PDT
by
samadams2000
(Nothing fills the void of a passing hurricane better than government)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson