[Rebelbase]

Very good. I'll take that source.

I'm still doubtful that Buran "was better" than the shuttle when it's only orbital flight was unmanned and was restricted to 2 orbits only due to "computer memory limitations".

But I will give credit to your country's space agency for recognizing they could get the same thing done cheaper using disposable launch vehicles.

We are only now realizing that 24 years later.

[eks41]

I'm still doubtful that Buran "was better" than the shuttle
Don't forget that Buran was created in the end of 80s against shuttles creates in 70s. So newer technologies were used.
And why buran is (sorry, WAS) more progressive: 1) Unlike the US Shuttle, the Energia basic core and strap-on system could also be used as an independent rocket in its own right due to modular design; 2) a larger payload of 30 tons into orbit compared to the 25-ton maximum of the US Shuttle; 3) a pair of jet engines to the aft end of their orbiter so that the final stage of landing could be performed under power. By contrast, the US orbiter is unpowered and must glide to its landing; 4) Compared to the American orbiter, maximum crew size was increased from seven to ten; 5) Buran could fly both manned and unmanned. Its only flight was under completely automatic control.