I understand. The first part was a fatal error. The second part was even worse. But I can imagine someone who could make both errors, and still not see it as justice to take his whole life for what was a mistake, and then a mistaken reaction to that mistake. I realize someone died. And if it'd been someone close to me, I might feel different. Maybe I'd want to see what kind of person he is. Or else I just shouldn't be on a jury.
There is premeditation. The hunter knew if he did not call for help the victim would die. Isn't that the difference between between first degree murder and, say, manslaughter?
< Maybe I'd want to see what kind of person he is. Or else I just shouldn't be on a jury. >
Well, if I ever get into trouble I'll pray you're on my jury. LOL. Otherwise, no, you don't belong on a jury. Even the worst lawyer can make the vilest of the vile LOOK sympathetic.