I read the same thing. And I posted it. It shared some Caucasian features, and some Asiatic features. If you came up with the rest on your own than you have some company of a like mind.
Your logic astounds me.
If the Kennewick man, a Euro-skull pre-dates the Siberian hunter groups, what is SO illogical about concluding that the European mammoth hunters were here before the Siberian hunter groups?
That is what "pre-dates" means.
There is nothing political about that anthropology.
The political stuff is the natural fall-out of the science.
That often happens with science...it creates fall-out. The "fall-out" HAS been discussed many times and places....not just on the racist-hate sites.
It's been considered a realistic and interesting fall-out. This isn't the FIRST time the Kennewick man has been brought up.
If you don't LIKE the fall-out, you DON'T blame the anthropology or the fall-out from it....or the people who chose to discuss it and, dare I say it, agree with the science. I guess that's racist swinism to you.
Lol. I guess you really hate it when people disagree with you or call you on your skewed logic.
You seem to conclude that people who follow the science, the logic, and come to the obvious conclusion are merely "racist swine."
That is kinda "oinky" logic itself.
Your brainpower has been pickled pinko, o ThoughtPolicePerson.