"Did Fitzgerald say there was an agreement protecting all of Miller's other sources besides Libby?"
Who knows? But there is this part from yesterday's WaPo article:
"One lawyer involved in the case said Miller's attorneys reached an agreement with Fitzgerald that may confine prosecutors' questions solely to Miller's conversations with Libby. Bennett, reached last night, said he could not discuss the terms of the agreement for Miller's testimony. Abrams did not return a call seeking comment."
This leads me to believe there was a deal on protecting other sources. It all seems very strange.
WaPo link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/29/AR2005092901974_2.html
I read that in another article although it was worded somewhat differently. That is why she is now willing to testify and it has nothing to do with a waiver from Libby.
But what does this tell you about the grand jury investigation? Does it mean they have determined no law was broken with regards to leaking a CIA agent and Fitzgerald is now looking into perjury or obstruction?
Something here is totally wacked, either they will determine no laws were broken or its turned into a witch hunt. That's the only way this makes any sense to me.........