You are clearly attempting to misstate Gilchrist's position on the war, which I stated accurately. You're trying to make him out as some sort of liberal when he's the only conservative in the race because you're afraid of the effect he'll have on your candidate. But lying about an opponent's record and positions is a liberal tactic, not a conservative one, and reveals your true worldview.
I correctly stated that Gilchrist's party's platform has a firm anti Iraq War stance which is liberalism. His party's platform opposes what would have amounted to the Vietnam War. Again, that's liberalism. Read it on their home page for yourself.
Gilchrist opposed the invasion of Iraq. That's liberalism. You'll counter with, "but he supports the troops." Well that's typical liberal spin machine philosophy that you hear from the anti-war left. You can't support the troops and oppose the war. That's the same as saying you support firemen except when they put out fires. Doesn't make sense. Thus, liberalism.
......... he won't win in that particular district.