Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who will rock the youth vote?
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^ | October 2nd,2005 | Salena Zito

Posted on 10/02/2005 4:49:32 AM PDT by salenaz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: salenaz
I don't believe Democraps look for the youth vote. In truth their base is comprised of the "Moron Vote", where simple minded talking point morons vote for them. All though the leaders are Pseudo intellectuals, the voting base is comprised mostly of dimwits! With todays educational system, the pool of dimwits are rich coming out of high school, hense the theory of the youth vote! In reality, its the moron base they seek!
21 posted on 10/02/2005 6:18:07 AM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: salenaz
Who will rock the youth vote?

How about something dramatic like "Vote or Die". That's genius!
22 posted on 10/02/2005 6:23:54 AM PDT by Vision (When Hillary Says She's Going To Put The Military On Our Borders...She Becomes Our Next President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So

I disagree..i think a *lot* more
young people voted Republican in '04
than the Democrats ever expected. Sick
of the sickness in the Democrat
Culture of Death.


23 posted on 10/02/2005 6:38:55 AM PDT by NickatNite2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: salenaz
Most analysts will concede that the Democratic Party's decline began the day it lost the middle class. With that traditional voting bloc gone, so went its low-hanging fruit -- genetically engineered youth who vote as their parents do.

Not too sure about that. When I was 20 I thought Reagan was evil incarnate. Luckily for America, I never voted until I was 30...and a lot smarter.

24 posted on 10/02/2005 6:44:54 AM PDT by AndrewB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: salenaz
Nobody will. All that bull shiite about the "Youth Vote" was just another ratmedia/rat figment of the imagination. On that count the WERE NOT LYING. They really believed it was coming to frenchie's rescue and the were really surprised when it didn't arrive (Probably because the drugged out morons who went to frenchie's BIG RALLIES ONM CAMPI AFTER CAMPI ) slept through Election day as they always have and always will. Politics means a recognition that there are things in this universe that are larger and more important then ourselves. Being barely above children themselves, the "Youths" don't care about anything but themselves. Politics to them are meaningless.
25 posted on 10/02/2005 7:50:53 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (The quisling ratmedia: always eager to remind us of why we hate them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
"The youth vote is irrelevant in modern elections. Only the MSM and its desire to "relive its youth" is interested in the promotion of the youth vote."

Precisely, because in the end the vaunted youth don't bother to vote. We've also learned even the promoters of the youth vote i.e."P-Diddy and his Vote or Die" campaign in '04 and Ben Afflek in 2000 are guilty of that one crucial act for campaign victory....
They forget or couldn't be bothered to vote.

26 posted on 10/02/2005 7:54:54 AM PDT by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: salenaz
The only youth vote that went bigtime democrat was the college towns(and most students are registered at their parents' house). I'll bet money that Bush actually won the youth vote of those who don't live in college towns - since he increased his margins in all areas outside of there and places like Detroit.

I was independent at 18, and became republican at 22.

27 posted on 10/02/2005 7:58:35 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("My Gov'nor don't got the answer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
The youth vote is irrelevant in modern elections.

If you look at the last prez election, that's largely true, except for one group--young christian voters. Largely ignored by the MSM pre-election (pdiddy makes for better copy and video) they did mention it post-election, when they did a post-mortem on the "rock the vote" debacle. The Religious Right did a bang-up job on getting their youth vote out.

28 posted on 10/02/2005 8:00:19 AM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

"...If you look at the red/blue map, you find that the Democrats win not only the inner..."

once, about 45 years ago, the dems had a huge chunk of the "greatest generation" who had won the war and come home and were open to idealistic rhetoric after the flat out horror of the war years. Now, indeed, the dems have the dependant poor and the guilty (I suppose) rich...and their (the Dems) "ideals" from Hell.


29 posted on 10/02/2005 10:18:42 AM PDT by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

Can't speak for Aggies but nationwide, the 18-29 age demographic is the only one the Libs carried and by 9 points. This whole "youth are more conservative than their parents" is an unsubstantiated myth. Much like the long held myth that the youth of the 60s and early 70s were vast majority raging yippies against the war. Or that the 80s under Reagan were the decade of greed. It's a all spin.

It's no surprise kids are more liberal; youth is a time of idealism and naivete.

Table 3 - Support for Presidential Candidates
Among Voters Age 18-29


National Results
2004
George Bush 44%
John Kerry 54%
Ralph Nader 1%


2000
George Bush 46.2%
Al Gore 47.6%
Ralph Nader 4.7%


1996
Bill Clinton 52.8%
Robert Dole 34.4%
Ross Perot 10.4%


1992
Bill Clinton 43.5%
George Bush Sr 34.3%
Ross Perot 22.2%


30 posted on 10/02/2005 10:36:41 AM PDT by wardaddy (Beauty is only a light switch away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack
dems have the dependant poor and the guilty (I suppose) rich
"Guilty" isn't the right word. It takes arrogance to blame the middle class for not doing what the rich can afford to do - patronize the "poor." The middle class can't afford to patronize "the poor," and has too much pride to accept being patronized by the rich and - if you really get down to it - by "black spokesmen" on "moral" grounds.

31 posted on 10/02/2005 12:17:33 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson