Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nomination of Harriet Miers to Supreme Court (Planned Parenthood Opposes Miers)
Planned Parenthood ^ | 10-03-05 | Planned Parenthood

Posted on 10/03/2005 6:25:05 AM PDT by CWW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last
To: ottersnot

Here's the choice: Trust Bush to nominate a stealth candidate who turns out to be a solid pick, or trust our RINOS to stand firm in the midst of a Democrat/Media nuclear assault. I'll go with Bush over Hagel/Snowe/Chaffee any day.


101 posted on 10/03/2005 9:14:10 AM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: CWW
Marvin Olasky talks to Texas Supreme Court Justice Nathan Hecht on Harriert Miers on the World Magazine website. For those who don't know, Olasky is an evangelical Christian intellectual in the mold of Chuck Colson. Nathan Hecht is ardently pro-life.

Miers has been a member of Valley View Christian Church in Dallas for 25 years, where Hecht has been an elder. He calls it a "conservative evangelical church... in the vernacular, fundamentalist, but the media have used that word to tar us." He says she was on the missions committee for ten years, taught children in Sunday School, made coffee, brought donuts: "Nothing she's asked to do in church is beneath her." On abortion, choosing his words carefully for an on-the-record statement, he says "her personal views are consistent with that of evangelical Christians... You can tell a lot about her from her decade of service in a conservative church."

Hecht says about Miers' judicial philosophy: "She's an orginalist -- that's the way she takes the Bible," and that's her approach to the Constitution as well -- "Originalist -- it means what it says." He notes that her legal practice involved writing contracts rather than tort law, so she was always looking at the plain meaning of the words: "Originalist." He also says she's not a social butterfly who will be swayed by Washington dinner table conversation: "She goes to the dinners she's supposed to go to. She's not on the social circuit."

I know Valley View Christian Church through my pro-life work. It is full of pro-lifers. I can't say whether any individual member is pro-life, but I would be surprised if someone who is not pro-life occupied a leadership position.

Stingray: Conservative blog       

        <-------- Visit Stingray blogsite for conservative Christian commentary

102 posted on 10/03/2005 9:18:07 AM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ottersnot

Souter was a totally unknown wierdo from Vermont. Miers is a member of the inner circle from Texas. Big difference.

Until she goes googly-eyed and starts braying about imaginary rights, I'm supporting her.


103 posted on 10/03/2005 9:21:20 AM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Really good points. Lucky us in NY to have Schumer AND Clinton.


104 posted on 10/03/2005 9:23:59 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

"The fact that people are concerned about the slaughter of 40 million unborn is a source of amusement to you. I see. It's all a joke to you? "

I'm more concerned about overturning the recent decision regarding eminent domain than I am about overturning Roe v. Wade.


105 posted on 10/03/2005 10:21:19 AM PDT by StandardDeviation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

Planned Parenthood also opposed Souter....


106 posted on 10/03/2005 2:35:50 PM PDT by Les_Miserables
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Les_Miserables

Yes, I know. You should've read a little further.

My point wasn't that Miers is automatically great pick because PP opposes her. PP would oppose a ham sandwich. I was more satiring the hand-wringers and knee-jerkers who are out in force today.


107 posted on 10/03/2005 2:38:49 PM PDT by Terpfen (Bush is playing chess. Remember that, and stop playing checkers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Decepticon
Supposedly, she did a lot of work with Exodus International.

http://www.exodus-international.org/

From their website:

Statement on Supreme Court Nominee Harriet Miers' Affiliation with Exodus International

--

Dated: October 3, 2005

Orlando, FL - Harriet Miers, nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court, served on the board of directors of Exodus Ministry in East Dallas, an organization that assists ex-offenders in finding jobs and places to live. The organization is in not related to Exodus International, the world’s largest educational and informational outreach dealing with homosexuality. Exodus International has not yet taken a position on Miers' nomination to the Court.

(Emphasis added)
108 posted on 10/03/2005 6:02:54 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Lucky us in NY to have Schumer AND Clinton.

Just because I am in Oregon, doesn't mean I don't have Scum-mer and Clintong. They are nationwide. Even though I left California, I still have Fiendstein and Botoxer.

I am still embarrassed whenever any of them get into the international spotlight. The four of them and that idiot Senator Widen here in Oregon make us all look bad...

109 posted on 10/03/2005 6:13:52 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: StandardDeviation

"I'm more concerned about overturning the recent decision regarding eminent domain than I am about overturning Roe v. Wade."

We all have our priorities. With some, it's innocent, human life. With others....


110 posted on 10/04/2005 5:33:02 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (ovrtaxt:"We're all tinfoil freaks and Dan Rather isn't." FR/focus/news/1496223/posts?page=44#44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
the hand-wringers and knee-jerkers who are out in force today.

Well I don't put myself in those categories but I am deeply disappointed as are a major part of the conservative base who have worked so hard for so long to get us to the point where we could post a known conservative with good credentials to the SCOTUS. Bush may know her like a book but we who elected him to do this job do not and we deserve better, much better.

111 posted on 10/04/2005 6:20:11 AM PDT by Les_Miserables
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
"We all have our priorities. With some, it's innocent, human life. With others...."

Don't get me wrong I'm all for overturning Roe v. Wade, not because I'm pro-life, but because I think it is an issue that should be left to the states.

I'd be equally upset if the end of Roe was followed by federal legislation banning abortion. I don't think the federal government has the constitutional authority to legislate regarding abortion.
112 posted on 10/04/2005 6:26:21 AM PDT by StandardDeviation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: CWW

I heard this on the radio, yesterday morning, but still the conservatives whined that they didn't know anything about her conservatie credentials. I also heard that she is a very active member of a fundamentalist church, and has been for the past twenty three years.


113 posted on 10/04/2005 6:34:21 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandardDeviation

"I'd be equally upset if the end of Roe was followed by federal legislation banning abortion. I don't think the federal government has the constitutional authority to legislate regarding abortion."

I wouldn't be 'equally upset' if there were a bunch of unconstitutional searches in seizures in every mosque. I would call it unconstituional, but I would also cross my fingers and hope that the courts drag their heels for a year or two before stopping it. Too many innocent lives are at stake for me to wholeheartedly oppose a little 'benign tyranny' when it's a matter of life-and-death.

Our problem is, we are a nation of laws. One day, we will be in a Nation of Love. That will be a wonderful day. Love should trump law, especially with a legal system as perverse and power hungry as this one.


114 posted on 10/05/2005 4:25:26 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (ovrtaxt:"We're all tinfoil freaks and Dan Rather isn't." FR/focus/news/1496223/posts?page=44#44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson