Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nomination of Harriet Miers to Supreme Court (Planned Parenthood Opposes Miers)
Planned Parenthood ^ | 10-03-05 | Planned Parenthood

Posted on 10/03/2005 6:25:05 AM PDT by CWW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: CWW


21 posted on 10/03/2005 6:31:16 AM PDT by looky hear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW; All
Iowahawk: He or She Is The Wrong Man or Woman For The Court
22 posted on 10/03/2005 6:31:18 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Mo1

Thanks for the ping, Mo! Hahaha! How very interesting. I wonder how the unappeasables will spin this.


23 posted on 10/03/2005 6:31:44 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CWW

If she really did that it makes me feel a little bit better about her.

It is still a bit disappointing anyway...it isn't exactly a nomination to get excited about.


24 posted on 10/03/2005 6:31:56 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW

I like her, I like her not, I like her.....


25 posted on 10/03/2005 6:32:24 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW

Ya know, maybe someone was right on the other thread when they suggested that he picked her expecting, maybe, that she would not get in, then he could nominate someone better who the Rats couldn't fight and he really wanted. Just speculation but time will tell. It IS interesting to watch who's opposing her though. It tells a lot.


26 posted on 10/03/2005 6:32:32 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Don't tell the the chicken little faction here at FR, they're too busy falling on their swords.


27 posted on 10/03/2005 6:32:40 AM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Rat-friends and baby killers are knee-jerk opponents to Bush. I am concerned, due to her history of contributing to rat baby killers.

A former college friend of Meiers is about to talk with Laura Ingraham in the next segment.


28 posted on 10/03/2005 6:32:55 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March ("They'll have to basically rip my fingers from this porch." com/focus/bloggers/1483977/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CWW

She wanted to change the pro-abortion activist position to one of neutrality. That's pretty weak ground for even a pro-abortion group to oppose her.

One thing we know is that they would oppose her no matter what her views were, simply because she was nominated by Bush.


29 posted on 10/03/2005 6:33:17 AM PDT by counterpunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW

Planned Parenthood opposed a Republican nominee? Colour me surprised.

"I am shocked, SHOCKED to find gambling in this establishment."


30 posted on 10/03/2005 6:33:35 AM PDT by Alexander Rubin (Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Planned Parenthood can go f*** themselves.


31 posted on 10/03/2005 6:34:30 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CWW
"During Miers' tenure as head of the Texas Bar Association she was a leader in the campaign to reverse the American Bar Association's pro-choice position on the right to choose. Had this campaign been successful, which it was not, the ABA would have been returned to its former position of neutrality."

Gee, imagine that! Even being neutral to abortion is not enough for the baby-killers.

32 posted on 10/03/2005 6:34:44 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Callahan

"Don't tell the the chicken little faction here at FR, they're too busy falling on their swords."

The fact that people are concerned about the slaughter of 40 million unborn is a source of amusement to you. I see. It's all a joke to you?


33 posted on 10/03/2005 6:34:56 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March ("They'll have to basically rip my fingers from this porch." com/focus/bloggers/1483977/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I think these groups prepare their opposing press releases for all potential nominees ahead of time.


34 posted on 10/03/2005 6:35:42 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CWW
Sorry this information came out too late. I'll never vote for Bush again because the geniuses on this thread are so convincing.
35 posted on 10/03/2005 6:35:55 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW

"Planned Parenthood opposses nomination"

That's all I need to hear - I approve! Curious about other views, but good to see the essentials are there hopefully.


36 posted on 10/03/2005 6:35:59 AM PDT by rjp2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate

' "During Miers' tenure as head of the Texas Bar Association she was a leader in the campaign to reverse the American Bar Association's pro-choice position on the right to choose. '

Thank you for that info. OK. Feeling more hopeful. Was concerned because she used to contribute to rats back in the 80s. But that was a while ago.


37 posted on 10/03/2005 6:37:24 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March ("They'll have to basically rip my fingers from this porch." com/focus/bloggers/1483977/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CWW

Well, as always, the SC pick serves to remind us that the main battle grounds in defense of the unborn are in our families and churches (and our schools).


38 posted on 10/03/2005 6:39:49 AM PDT by Puddleglum (Thank God the Boston blowhard lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

Well, at least she is opposed by all the right people.

-----
A good sign really. It is early.


39 posted on 10/03/2005 6:39:53 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
Let's wait and see what comes to the surface on Miers. For the moment this item about making abortion a political rather than a legal issue appears hopeful. She appears, at least in this snippet to understand the role of the courts and the legislatures in our system which is more that you can say about any of the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
40 posted on 10/03/2005 6:39:55 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson