Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Swedish submarine stays hidden to Americans
Expressen (in Swedish only) ^ | 03 October 2005

Posted on 10/03/2005 7:51:25 AM PDT by anguish

Swedish submarine stays hidden to Americans

Despite two months of searching, the American navy still have problems locating the Swedish submarine 'Gotland' in a series of cat-and-mouse games in American waters. Now also the Canadian and Australian navies will practice finding Swedish subs. This was recently given the green light by the Swedish government according to 'Blekinge Läns Tidning' [Swedish newspaper]

The US has since this summer rented 'HMS Gotland' with two crews. The submarine is to stay for a year, but the contract can be extended because of the problems in locating it. This, in turn, pleasures Kockums [the shipyard building these subs] in Karlskrona.
- It shows that our stealth technology is well developed, says the shipyard's director of information Kjell Göthe. He hopes that the Swedish technology now gets its international break-through.
'HMS Gotland' is equipped with sterling engines which makes it possible for the submarine to stay submerged for several weeks. To the Swedish navy, the benefit is to practice in a new environment with whales and dolphins.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: navy; submarine; sweden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Quick translation by yours truly - don't flame me for spelling and grammar, please :P

As a sidenote, this story began when a Swedish sub (same class, maybe the same ship) on its way to the Mediterranean met up to practice with a LA-class sub in the Atlantic a couple of years ago. The American response, at that time, was that the sub "came and disappeared like a ghost". In the Med it also made life miserable for the crew of a French nuclear sub.

Links:
Gotland Class submarine (Kockums)
Gotland Class submarine (Naval-technology.com)

1 posted on 10/03/2005 7:51:30 AM PDT by anguish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

PING


2 posted on 10/03/2005 7:53:36 AM PDT by Severa (I can't take this stress anymore...quick, get me a marker to sniff....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1234; american colleen; AndyPH; anguish; AzSteven; Bartholomew Roberts; Bushwacker777; ...
An unusually militant Swedish Ping ;)
3 posted on 10/03/2005 7:53:57 AM PDT by anguish (while science catches up.... mysticism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anguish

It is a small diesel boat - non nuclear so it has to surface on a regular basis to charge its batteries. I don't think the AIP drive charges its batteries to stay down however that would be pretty impressive.

From the hull design it looks pretty impressive but all diesel boats once submerged are very quiet but limited range - as opposed to a nuc boat that can go deep and around the world without surfacing.

Diesels have always been quiet and difficult when submerged to find - sadly we (US Navy) got rid of all our active diesle boats for nuc as a military weapon.


4 posted on 10/03/2005 8:01:52 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: anguish; Mentat

6 posted on 10/03/2005 8:03:32 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Swedish Ping List master)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: anguish

Modern D-E submarines (especially those with AIP) can be bl@@dy murder to find. Particularly in littoral waters. They can have lower acoustic signatures than nuke boats, and in littoral environments can be a viable threat. Obviously this requires a competent crew, and most nations with DE subs either do not have the most modern versions or lack hgihly-trained crews. However were we to face a foe nation that had a selection of modern D-E boats, and had actually put the effort into training top-notch crews, and they decided to delve solely into littoral waters .....well, those D-E boats would become a major pain. Not saying they would win, but would definitely cause a lot of headaches (and might even draw blood).


7 posted on 10/03/2005 8:03:34 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
I don't think the AIP drive charges its batteries to stay down however that would be pretty impressive.
Two weeks (at 5 knots) is the offical figure on how long it can stay submerged.
8 posted on 10/03/2005 8:06:44 AM PDT by anguish (while science catches up.... mysticism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anguish

Saw Gotland exhibit at a recent Navy expo and was extremely impressed...small and quiet.


9 posted on 10/03/2005 8:07:30 AM PDT by meandog (FUDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobbdobbs
equipped with sterling engines which makes it possible for the submarine to stay submerged for several weeks.

non sequitur

Not Sterling engines, Stirling Air Independent Propulsion, using LOX (hold the cream cheese)

10 posted on 10/03/2005 8:07:34 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (The best things happen just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: anguish

Got Land?

11 posted on 10/03/2005 8:07:55 AM PDT by mikrofon (Sub Par Performance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
It is a small diesel boat - non nuclear so it has to surface on a regular basis to charge its batteries. I don't think the AIP drive charges its batteries to stay down however that would be pretty impressive.

For trans-ocean trips a nuke sub would be hugely advantageous, however if all a nation needed to do is defend its shores then a D-E boat is more than sufficient. And with AIP they do not need to regularly surface .....they can stay under for around 2 weeks.

From the website for the Kockums Stirling AIP system:Instead of a number of days, a Stirling AIP submarine can extend the time submerged to weeks and thus outperform any other conventional submarine with regard to that key capability - submerged endurance.

In littoral waters, the ability to stay submerged for a couple of weeks is a pretty potent ability. Non-AIP subs have to pop up every couple of days, as compared to a couple of weeks for AIP D-E boats.

12 posted on 10/03/2005 8:09:35 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
...however if all a nation needed to do is defend its shores then a D-E boat is more than sufficient.

Hmmmmm..... Like an island off the coast of China, perhaps?

13 posted on 10/03/2005 8:16:41 AM PDT by uglybiker (This tagline sponsored by the Masonic/Illuminati/NWO Conspiracy. BOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

And on the surface, they sound like any other boat. If they don't transmit anything on the surface, they're extremely hard to find.


14 posted on 10/03/2005 8:36:14 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anguish

PROPULSION SYSTEMS
The submarine is equipped with two MTU diesel engines and two Kockums V4-275R Stirling Air Independent Propulsion (AIP) units. The Stirling engines are mounted in elastic, soundproof modules and each provide up to 75kW. The submarine has the capacity for two weeks of air independent propulsion at a speed of 5 knots without snorting. The AIP uses liquid oxygen and diesel fuel in a controlled inert (helium) environment. The AIP liquid oxygen tanks are located on the deck below the engines. The propulsion system provides a speed of 11 knots surfaced and 20 knots dived.


15 posted on 10/03/2005 8:39:06 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

Fantastic for coastal defense. Terrible for strategic capability. The AIP systems are obviously reliant on a home port or tenders to refuel their LOX.


16 posted on 10/03/2005 8:41:33 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bobbdobbs

Walther cycle?


17 posted on 10/03/2005 8:44:43 AM PDT by null and void (Up to maximum individual freedom consistent with order, or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

Oh. Not Walther cycle...


18 posted on 10/03/2005 8:46:33 AM PDT by null and void (Up to maximum individual freedom consistent with order, or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Yet, I was under the impression we still could manufacture diesel boats. Taiwan is supposed to buy some from us, but it is being held up in their legislature. (Evidently Taiwan doesn't feel it has to maintain its capability. This belief is based on the assumption that we will defend Taiwan.)


19 posted on 10/03/2005 8:47:13 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anguish

Bout time we got credit 4 sumtin side the screw prop and dynomite!~


20 posted on 10/03/2005 9:13:56 AM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson