Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Conservatives Not Thrilled by Miers
MSNBC ^ | 10/3/05

Posted on 10/03/2005 8:58:05 AM PDT by gopwinsin04

Edited on 10/03/2005 9:01:45 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
To: grassboots.org; Always Right

-5%....-10%....-15%


21 posted on 10/03/2005 9:10:15 AM PDT by TXBSAFH (Free Traitors are communist China's modern day "Useful Idiots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Sure it makes sense. GWBush poll numbers are down and the MSM is an arm of the Donks. Will spin anti Bush every time. If it wasn't Meijers it would be her clone. That's as good as it gets these days

The Repubs own Congress and the White House and the Judicial Branch. If they can't flex some muscle under THESE circumstances, what happens if, God forbid, the Dems take over the House or Senate in 2006???? I have never seen the Dems so weak. Unfortunately, the Repubs don't seem able to muster a spine in the face of these guys. Is there something I'm not understanding here???

22 posted on 10/03/2005 9:10:17 AM PDT by podkane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH
I am sadly in that group, I was hoping for better from GW. He had the perfect opportunity to shore up the base and do the right thing

Picking a nominee isn't about shoring up the base

A nomination is about picking a person that will follow the Constitution

If a nominee follows the Constitution ... what is there to fear?

23 posted on 10/03/2005 9:10:37 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Some conservatives are pathologically incapable of being thrilled, to be fair.


24 posted on 10/03/2005 9:11:35 AM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
So was Reagan. Wait for more information before you make up your mind.

Yeah, but she was a Democrat when Reagan was in office. Heck, JFK was a tax-cutting anti-communist hawk. Back then the Democrats had some respectability. Democrats have become nothing more than terrorist-sympathizing American-hating baby-killing Communists.

25 posted on 10/03/2005 9:12:11 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Souter said under oath he would, he hasn't. I fear this will be another Souter.


26 posted on 10/03/2005 9:12:37 AM PDT by TXBSAFH (Free Traitors are communist China's modern day "Useful Idiots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
Some?
27 posted on 10/03/2005 9:12:54 AM PDT by b4its2late (Middle age is when broadness of the mind and narrowness of the waist change places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Bush misunderestimated conservative reaction.


28 posted on 10/03/2005 9:13:18 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Bush's aproval Ratings over the next week....45%.....42%.....39%.....35%

Totally.

29 posted on 10/03/2005 9:13:21 AM PDT by Huck ("If people are disappointed, they have every reason to be." Mark Levin on GW's latest lame move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Not thrilled? Pissed off is more like it. I didn't work my butt off last Aug, Sept, and Oct for this crap.


30 posted on 10/03/2005 9:13:52 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shaka
I agree. No more stealth candidates!
Why does President Bush have to nominate a woman judge?
Is there a quota of women for SCOTUS? Is it 2 women? There are more women than men in the USA so maybe the quota should be 4 women.
Or maybe, just maybe, it should be the most qualified 7 judges in the USA regardless of the other factors.
Did Pres Bush nominate her to pay back a favor?
Did Pres Bush nominate her because Hitlery and her side of the aisle would be more likely vote for her?
It will look bad to withdraw her nomination but I hope that he does.
Sandra Day O'Connor does not have to be replaced by another left leaning woman. We deserve to have the best!
31 posted on 10/03/2005 9:14:30 AM PDT by OldMagazine (You can only do what you can do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

My concern is her firm --- Locke, Lidell, Sapp.

I have been underwhelmed by them in the past.

Had some company litigation with them (I was a third-party witness, no dog in the fight) and the lawyers were pretty dishonest (worse than typical lawyers).

They were very inconsiderate on a personal level.

Big firm, though, so it's hard to generalize. But birds of a feather.


32 posted on 10/03/2005 9:15:06 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (A good friend helps you move. A great friend helps you move a body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH; gopwinsin04
The only remotely conservative source-aside from Hugh Hewitt-that's commented favorably upon this nomination is the ACLJ.
33 posted on 10/03/2005 9:15:08 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("I'm okay with being unimpressive. It helps me sleep better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: podkane

If he would have just shot the bullett, pulled a true conservative up, then the base once again would be charged and we could have weathered the ongoing storms. Like it is, it's like we must hide once again under the sheets until the boogie man goes away. Sucks.


34 posted on 10/03/2005 9:15:10 AM PDT by Shaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

And what do you base using the word "abomination" on? Do you know her other than what's come out in the past five minutes? Yesterday, I said Donald Sutherland was the biggest drama queen I've ever seen, but it looks like that title now goes to the MIERS SUCKS faction here on FR. My gosh.


35 posted on 10/03/2005 9:15:16 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
This isn't what I helped campaign for, as a volunteer; and it's not what I supported, with numerous (and substantial) cash donations.

Ditto that! Bush's approval ratings are about to nosedive. What an absolutely idiotic pick.

36 posted on 10/03/2005 9:15:37 AM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
So was Reagan. Wait for more information before you make up your mind.

That she was a Dem during the Reagan years speaks volumes to me.

37 posted on 10/03/2005 9:15:52 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

Reagan was a Democrat when Democrats weren't so loony.


38 posted on 10/03/2005 9:16:04 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (North Texas Solutions http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos


Sure you are. NOT.


39 posted on 10/03/2005 9:16:17 AM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Bahbah; Howlin

I am thinking that you are swimming up stream here!!! LOL

It is gonna be really hard to get some freepers to take time to check her out...especially when they are told that she WAS a democrat in the 80's....

and how much that might indicate her feelings toward being pro-choice...

I am still swimming with you and Bahbah, and Howlin...and a few others...so we need to make sure to point out links, articles, etc., that will have information on her. I know I will feel better myself if I can find an indication about how she feels on the pro-life issues...


40 posted on 10/03/2005 9:16:25 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Mike Pence for President of the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson