Skip to comments.(Part 1)FR EXCLUSIVE: Breaking -- Major Newspaper Doing Blockbuster Story on Peter Paul and Hillary
Posted on 10/03/2005 4:38:01 PM PDT by doug from upland
(Part 1)FR EXCLUSIVE: Breaking -- Major Newspaper Doing Blockbuster Story on Peter Paul and Hillary
Oct. 3, 2005
Doug from Upland
Reporting from Upland, CA
FReepers, we have this report exclusively for you first here on FreeRepublic, the political website of record. A major newspaper, the identity of which will be released later this week, will publish a blockbuster story on Sunday discussing donor Peter Paul and the beneficiary of his $1.9 million campaign contribution in 2000, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
We do not know yet the path the story will take, but in 8,000 words, Hillary is not going to be very happy. Hillary, Bill, and their powerful cadre of spinners and coverup artists have been unable to stop the story.
As Tom DeLay faced his second indictment today, the questions continue to be asked by Paul. Why has Hillary Clinton been allowed to file three false FEC reports? Why has no one attempted to bring her to justice? Why has the biggest campaign fraud on record not been above the fold on page one in major newspapers? Why has it not lead nightly news stories?
It is more than just Hillary who is involved. Bill Clinton, Ed Rendell and Terry McAuliffe are up to their eyeballs in this scandal. David Rosen, a low level functionary in Hillary's campaign, was up to his eyeballs, but a Los Angeles jury decided he was not the one to punish. Hillary 2000 Campaign treasurer Andrew Grossman, who signed all three of the fraudulent FEC reports, is up to his eyeballs in the scandal. Amazingly, Grossman has so far escaped indictment.
In 2001, prior to the due date of the final amended FEC report, attorney David Kendall was served on behalf of Hillary in Paul's unprecedented and historic civil suit against a former president and sitting senator for fraud and conspiracy. His client was provided with cancelled checks and invoices, along with a demand to declare the campaign contributions or return the money. For five years the massive coverup has continued. The civil case, after review by the California Supreme Court, is headed for a Los Angeles superior court early in 2006 where Hillary, Bill, and several others will be under oath. Many of the Hollywood elite who attended the gala fundraising concert in 2000 are on the witness list. It will be a civil trial to remember and may be the only thing standing in the way of Hillary becoming commander in chief.
The case against Tom DeLay may be esoteric and, although it may have pushed the envelope, may not have been criminal conduct. What Hillary did is clearly criminal, it is easy to understand, and it was done in broad daylight.
Where is New York's own Ronnie Earle? Where is a prosecutor with the guts to go after those who committed the mother of all campaign finance scandals?
SPECIAL NOTE: It is expected that the hard-hitting documentary INDICTING HILLARY will be released during the campaign of 2006. INDICTING HILLARY chronicles her massive campaign finance fraud, her continuing failure to obey the law, her refusal to amend three fraudulent reports, and the aiding and abetting of her criminal conduct by a former president, William Jefferson Clinton, a current governor/former DNC chairman, Ed Rendell, and the immediate past DNC chairman, Terry McAuliffe. Hillary, you'd better put some ice on that.
If it's true, I hope she is exposed.
Answer: FBI Files.
Great job Doug!!!
Looks interesting, and may be something to watch. I don't expect it to go very far as the liberal media will resist reporting one this as much as possible.
They better get this one going. If not it will prove the theory 'Whatever it takes to get elected' true again for the Clintonista's.
If this does, in fact, get published as advertised, it will not even cause much noise. It will disappear with no observable mark on Mrs. Bill. Republicans will be just as eager to bury it as Democrats.
Justice is truly blind on occasion.
Ummmmmm, major liberal media is doing the story.
Lets never forget that it was Free Republic who got the Rathergate exposed and vocalized to the point were the MSM couldn't ignore it forever. If enough stink is raised, people will smell it.
I'm sure hoping for a SwiftBoat Vet type ad campaign to bring down the wicked witch named hildabeast once and for all.
I guess what's "news" about this is that some paper (unnamed at that) is going to do a story on it. Big whoop.
Sufficient facts are already already out there and no one has cared so far. Why should it grow legs now?
Hillary as commander-in-chief even scares the devil out of liberals in the age of Iran as a nuclear power.
wooohooo! Alright Doug!
8000 is a lot of words. One hopes for pith, vinegar and substance.
I hope they throw a tarp over her first.
Sure, but will it really catch on with the rest of the 'liberal media'? I would hope so, but I have my doubts given the history of things that the Clintons have done and easily gotten away with. We'll see...