Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ajolympian2004
Ann's choice, Janice Rodgers-Brown. Not enough intestinal fortitude in the White House to go with that choice.

Ole Arlen already has stated he will not support for elevation any of the judges that were filibustered but eventually confirmed as part of the "Gang of 14" deal. So right off the bat, that means he won't support Brown, and the best you get is a vote out of committee with no recommendation.

That alone makes Ann's point laughable. If she'd have suggested Edith Jones, Michael Luttig, or someone who did not fall into that category, she'd have a better point. But picking someone whom you know will not get support instead is just plain dumb.

270 posted on 10/04/2005 11:59:28 AM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: XJarhead
Ole Arlen already has stated he will not support for elevation any of the judges that were filibustered but eventually confirmed as part of the "Gang of 14" deal. So right off the bat, that means he won't support Brown, and the best you get is a vote out of committee with no recommendation

Tell me again why President Bush took the unusual step of supporting him in the 2004 Pennsylvania Primary?

287 posted on 10/04/2005 12:05:09 PM PDT by steveegg (The quarterly FReepathon is the price you pay for FR...until enough people become monthlies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson