To: Dane
How does the support of-or opposition to, for that matter-a particular Republican candidate that ran in a presidential primary five years negate the validity of his argument?
To: Do not dub me shapka broham; holdonnow
How does the support of(bill krystol)-or opposition to, for that matter-a particular Republican candidate that ran in a presidential primary five years(ago, mccain) negate the validity of his argument? JMO, the fact that both bill krystol and mark levin were both using the same talking point yesterday(Bush flinched) says volumes to me(i.e there are elitists on both sides of the aisle).
661 posted on
10/04/2005 3:05:25 PM PDT by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson