"Is he with us or with the enemy. There is no in between."
Jim,
I know that you are not a dumb person in any means, but to dis-allow the third option does not look well upon you.. for there is the middle option, of being against both sides of an issue and having one's own thoughts.. and the facts could just as easy back up that option, in regards to the actions of those who struck us on 9/11 and that this White House "overlooked/missed" facts that show that Iraq was not as big a threat as the White House stated..
For while I will agree that the leadership of Iraq "might" have attacked us head-on, if given the chance.. in all truthfulness, I didn't see that happening, as their style was more of pick and choose their targets, based on what they could gain from it.. and attacking us, would have been their downfall as has been shown by this war...
Right. How about spewing the leftist talking points? If you cannot see for yourself that Saddam Hussein himself was a bloody terrorist and with nukes or other weapons of mass destruction his fascist regime would be a threat to the entire region and a direct threat to our allies and to our national interests and therefore a threat to the entire world then you're not nearly as smart as some people may have mistakenly given you credit for.