Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mo1
Ann is more concerned with fighting.

I think you're misreading her. I didin't hear the interview, but my impression is that a good knock down drag-out fight is more likely to get us a better nominee. I agree with that.

Our side looks weak, and we,ve pick a nominee that will first avoid a fight, and second be a conservative nominee. That's ax-backwards thinking.

We need an in-your-face, and up-yours nominee. THEN we'll start getting tax-cuts, oil drilling, new refinerys, nuculear power and all the things that come to winners.

As it is, we are in line to get all the things that come to losers. I'm pi$$ed, cuz we deserve better.

Your thinking is too small.

34 posted on 10/05/2005 10:11:09 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Balding_Eagle
That's ax-backwards thinking.

I think you meant to say "that's bass-ackwards" thinking.

36 posted on 10/05/2005 10:16:31 AM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Balding_Eagle
Our side looks weak, and we,ve pick a nominee that will first avoid a fight, and second be a conservative nominee. That's ax-backwards thinking

Oh and Ann calling for the impeachment of the president makes us look stronger???

Sorry .. I'll pass on Ann suggestion

38 posted on 10/05/2005 10:19:50 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson