Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miers Nomination Provokes Concern Among Some Conservatives
The Post Chronicle ^ | 10\5\2005 | Linda Chavez

Posted on 10/05/2005 9:07:01 AM PDT by RepublicNewbie

The naming of White House counsel Harriet Miers to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor has provoked serious concern among some conservatives. They worry that Miers may take positions all too similar to O'Connor's on issues like affirmative action. O'Connor was often the swing vote on controversial social issues from abortion to school prayer, and she actually wrote the majority opinion in one of the most important decisions on affirmative action in the last two decades. Writing for a 5-4 majority in a University of Michigan law school case, Grutter v. Bollinger, O'Connor upheld the use of race to achieve diversity, but she then joined the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Scalia, Thomas, Kennedy and Breyer to reject the university's affirmative action program for undergraduates in Gratz v. Bollinger. Most conservatives hoped that with O'Connor gone, the Supreme Court might revisit affirmative action with a decision that once and for all rejects racial preferences as permissible public policy. But it may be that even without further action by the court, the practice of granting preference to minority students is beginning to lose favor on college campuses.

(Excerpt) Read more at postchronicle.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deadhorse; harrietmiers; lindachavez
Linda Chavez from today's Post Chronicle
1 posted on 10/05/2005 9:07:05 AM PDT by RepublicNewbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RepublicNewbie

Does NARAL oppose the nomination? If not, then she's wrong for the job.

I support using NARAL's opposition as a litmus test for damn near everything, since they are so far left and one-trick ponies.


2 posted on 10/05/2005 9:16:14 AM PDT by AbeKrieger (Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger

NARAL knows better than to support the person in whom they are interested in this climate.

They are more likely to oppose to whatever degree. Do you truly think they are utterly stupid?


3 posted on 10/05/2005 9:28:24 AM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger

What does it mean if they haven't yet outright opposed?
http://www.naral.org/about/newsroom/pressrelease/pr10032005_miers.cfm


4 posted on 10/05/2005 9:42:55 AM PDT by mosquitobite (What we permit; we promote. ~ Mark Sanford for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spirited
Do you truly think they are utterly stupid?

If they are that smart then I give them their political due. But I can't believe that they would not be out there shrieking if this candidate did not absolutely toe the line as they see it.

5 posted on 10/05/2005 12:10:11 PM PDT by AbeKrieger (Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson