Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miers Said to Be Unfazed by Criticism
AP ^ | October 6, 2005 | AP

Posted on 10/06/2005 5:17:35 PM PDT by freedomdefender

Harriet Miers is unfazed by the criticism and questioning of her qualifications as she seeks to become the next Supreme Court justice, a longtime friend said Thursday.

"She's excited. She's working hard at it. The criticism, I think, is rolling off her back as it usually does," said Justice Nathan Hecht of the Texas Supreme Court.

Hecht, who has known Miers for 30 years, said he has visited her several times since she was nominated by President Bush on Monday.

A new poll indicates people are uncertain about Miers. In an AP-Ipsos poll taken this week, two thirds of those surveyed didn't know enough about Miers to have an opinion of her. Just 41 percent said the Senate should confirm her, lower than similar ratings for Roberts after his nomination; 27 percent said she should not be confirmed and 32 percent weren't sure.

The White House said that former Indiana Republican Sen. Dan Coats, who has most recently served as ambassador to Germany, will serve as Miers' escort through the confirmation process, much as former Sen. Fred Thompson did for Chief Justice John Roberts.

"Senator Coats will be working closely with the nominee and serving as a public advocate for her," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said. "He will help advise her throughout the process. Senator Coats' role will be to attend meetings with senators on Harriet's courtesy visits."

The choice of Miers, a veteran lawyer and White House aide who has never been a judge _ and therefore has no record of judicial decisions _ has worried some Republican senators, anti-abortion activists and others who question the depth of her conservative views. Democrats, meanwhile, worry that she will prove too conservative.

"I don't have any doubt that she'll be conservative," Hecht said in an interview on NBC"s "Today" show. "Whether she'll move the court to the right I don't know."

Hecht said he was confident that Miers is "pro-life" but can't predict whether she would vote to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion.

Miers' commitment to her evangelical church in Dallas "shapes the kind of person that she is," Hecht said. "It doesn't shape her view on cases. In fact, almost the opposite."

"Someone who is very committed to their faith is also going to be committed to the oath that they take as a judge, and is going to judge cases fairly and is not going to let personal or religious views or any other kind of views influence the decisions in actual cases," he told CBS' "The Early Show."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: harrietmiers; miers; passthekoolaid; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2005 5:17:38 PM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

She has neither the conservative nor judicial bona fides. She's probably a very nice person, but that's not the issue.


2 posted on 10/06/2005 5:21:39 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

And you have to admit she totally botched the vetting process this time around. Look at the mess. Actually, I really am starting to think both parties are in this together. I think we're the suckers.


3 posted on 10/06/2005 5:25:04 PM PDT by Huck ("Sometimes you're better off not knowing how much you've been had." --Bob Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"She has neither the conservative nor judicial bona fides."

Oh. But the lunatic Ruth Bader Ginsburg has the judicial bonafides.

4 posted on 10/06/2005 5:25:31 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

"She has neither the conservative nor judicial bona fides. She's probably a very nice person, but that's not the issue."

Remember, the Constitution does not require a Justice be a Judge or even an attorney. Please judge the woman by the 'content of her character'.

You may now resume your normal bitching < GG>!


5 posted on 10/06/2005 5:26:04 PM PDT by lawdude (Liberalism is a mental disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
She has neither the conservative

You don't know this for certain.

nor judicial bona fides.

You don't have to even be a lawyer to serve on the Supreme Court. Do you think the Founding Fathers were stupid?

I think they had the right idea. Farmers were the builders and architects of our country. Lawyers run it now. How far away from the Constitution have we gotten?

6 posted on 10/06/2005 5:28:15 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huck
And you have to admit she totally botched the vetting process this time around.

Yeah she only has vetted Bush's stellar judicial picks.

Your personal animus sour grapes routine is getting old.

7 posted on 10/06/2005 5:29:16 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

What are the odds of her stepping down on her own by this time next week? 50-50?


8 posted on 10/06/2005 5:29:28 PM PDT by CedarDave (OU Bombing -- now knowing more about what we didn't know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

She's Bush's pick. She's a Texan. She's an underdog.

I love strong, dig-in-their-heels-and-bite-back Texas women, and I love championing the underdog.

Poking a stick at her won't amount to more than a flea bite.


9 posted on 10/06/2005 5:29:30 PM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

"I don't have any doubt that she'll be conservative," Hecht said in an interview on NBC"s "Today" show. "Whether she'll move the court to the right I don't know."

Miers' commitment to her evangelical church in Dallas "shapes the kind of person that she is," Hecht said. "It doesn't shape her view on cases. In fact, almost the opposite."

"Someone who is very committed to their faith is also going to be committed to the oath that they take as a judge, and is going to judge cases fairly and is not going to let personal or religious views or any other kind of views influence the decisions in actual cases,"

Well, there you have it. An evangelical Christian moderate who'll let them do whatever they want.

Once again, Jimmah has told his base - F**k you very much.


10 posted on 10/06/2005 5:30:36 PM PDT by d2e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Farmers were the builders and architects of our country. Lawyers run it now. How far away from the Constitution have we gotten?

Worth repeating!

11 posted on 10/06/2005 5:31:43 PM PDT by hobson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
No doubt she went and hauled out all her old text books from that Constitutional law class she took as a student and is busily boning up for her new job.
12 posted on 10/06/2005 5:31:49 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

A person that never makes mistakes should not be fazed by criticism from ordinary masses.


13 posted on 10/06/2005 5:32:12 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
And you have to admit she totally botched the vetting process this time around. Look at the mess.

LOL...

14 posted on 10/06/2005 5:32:50 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
What are the odds of her stepping down on her own by this time next week? 50-50?

More like 0, nada, empty set.

15 posted on 10/06/2005 5:33:48 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lawdude

I like her not being a judge. In 1930, at the peak of his power, Al Capone had most judges "on the take" (receiving graft).


16 posted on 10/06/2005 5:35:50 PM PDT by FreeRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lawdude

Did I read somewhere that something like 30% of all SC Justices have not been judges?


17 posted on 10/06/2005 5:38:27 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

The President does not agree with you. He wins.


18 posted on 10/06/2005 5:38:51 PM PDT by Chicha Kazembe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Miers will never step down. She's working hard for confirmation.


19 posted on 10/06/2005 5:39:05 PM PDT by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
No doubt she went and hauled out all her old text books from that Constitutional law class she took as a student and is busily boning up for her new job.

Bet one of them is not Laurence Tribe's Constitutional Law.  Well over a thousand pages of liberal extrapolation.  Must weigh twenty pounds.

20 posted on 10/06/2005 5:39:13 PM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson