Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
Most fatal mutations are fatal before conception or before birth.

Branching to a new species is unlikely or impossible in a large population that is continuously interbreeding. Speciation requires an isolating mechanism.

A mutation may not be fatal until the system that is regulated by the code is highly stressed. Auto-Immune genetic defects work that way. There is not enough time, even if the mutating edits happen to let the creature function. It has been demonstrated by scientific research that Darwin's Finches were not mutations outside of their original code, which means that environmental pressures do not create new code, rather they reach to existing code to see if the population can survive. If there is no code to help the population to adapt enough, they go extinct.

We see this every year as more and more creatures devolve to the point where they are not as versatile as they once were, and go extinct.

Breeding has shown us that reproduction does not create new code. It isolates certain expressions. The isolation always does the same thing until the "blue blooded" little critters grow huge noses and ears, then die from weak cell structure (defective DNA). Unless they breed back into the less mutated population in time.

Bottom line, science show us devolution on a massive scale, within mankind's genetic code, as well as the animal kingdom. If bacteria could evolve via Darwinian Evolution, there would be no more life on earth. The limits were coded in intentionally by a sovereign Creator.

453 posted on 10/13/2005 2:34:48 PM PDT by bondserv (God governs our universe and has seen fit to offer us a pardon. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]


To: bondserv

Peddle your fantasies somewhere else. You aren't worth responding to.


454 posted on 10/13/2005 2:39:58 PM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies ]

To: bondserv
Let me explain why I won't be responding in detail. First, you are making a large number of claims that can actually be tested. Second, your claims contradict 200 years of accumulated knowledge. Third, if your claims had any merit they would be jumped on by people who have aspirations of scientific credibility, like Behe, Dembski, Denton and others in the ID movement.

If people who are trained in science and motivated to see evidence such as you present can't see it, then you are a disposable loony tune.

Down the chute with you.

455 posted on 10/13/2005 2:50:42 PM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson