Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My "Dear George" Letter
Michael Graham ^ | 10/07/2005 | Michael Graham

Posted on 10/07/2005 9:10:28 AM PDT by Sabramerican

My "Dear George" Letter

Sorry, George, but you lost me at Harriet. When a reporter asked you Oct. 4 if Harriet Miers was the most qualified possible candidate for the U.S. Supreme Court and you answered, "Yes þ I picked the best person I could find" ‹ and you did it with a straight face ‹ that was it.

I'm done. Check, please! I'm outta here.

I am no longer a George W. Bush supporter. As a conservative, I have been bitch-slapped by this man for the last time. Those suffering from "Battered Conservative's Syndrome" will no doubt make excuses and find some reason to stay with this serial abuser of our principles, but not me. I have had enough.

I've had enough of defending a "conservative" president who has spent money faster and grown government bigger than any president since LBJ. I've had enough of a "conservative" who refuses to do anything to secure our borders, and whose only plan to stop illegal immigration is to hand out temporary worker permits to create even MORE future illegals.

And George, when you look me in the eye and throw me a good old-fashioned Bill Clinton "I did not have sex with that woman" line like Harriet Miers is the most qualified person in America for the Supreme Court þ buddy, you're on your own.

It's bad enough that she's hardly conservative and has no record of achievement. Mr. President, making an affirmative-action appointment of an unqualified crony to one of the highest offices of the land is wrong, no matter what your politics. It's not just a mistake. It is shameful. You should be ashamed of yourself.

The fact that you aren't is the reason you just lost me.

Again and again, watching you throw tax dollars around like a drunken teenager at a New Orleans strip joint, I've told myself, "Stick with George, because he gets the big ones right." And the biggest of the "big ones" has always been rescuing America from an out-of-control, activist Supreme Court. You promised me a Scalia. Instead, you're sticking me with a "sistah," a woman whose qualifications for the Supreme Court begin and end in her brassiere.

She's no Scalia. She's no Thomas. She's not even a Ginsburg or a Souter. She's a joke ‹ FEMA's Michael Brown in a skirt. In fact, that's an insult to Brown, who had at least some experience as a judge, if only at horse shows.

Your nomination of Harriet Miers is an insult to the court, to conservatives and to any American who cares about competence. She's an utterly unqualified crony who has never sat on the bench, never written on constitutional issues, never been involved in a single significant issue or overseen an important case. According to you, Mr. President, she's been your attorney off and on for 10 years, and you've never once discussed the issue of abortion and the Constitution!

Good grief, my mailman and I have had that conversation.

George, you have done more than merely betray your conservative supporters. You have embarrassed us. You have made incompetence and cronyism part of the conservative character. You kept CIA director George Tenet after the worst terrorist attack in American history occurred on his watch. You kept Michael "Best In Show" Brown in a job at FEMA he was never qualified to do. And now you're giving the Dallas Library Lady a seat on the highest court in the land and telling us, "Trust me, I know she's good"?

Sorry, no dice.

Trust you? You just went on TV and told me that Harriet Miers is the most qualified person in America to sit on the Supreme Court! C'mon George, even Harriet's MOM doesn't believe that.

And now we find out that, in addition to giving campaign checks to Al Gore, Miers chaired an American Bar Association panel that recommended legalization of gay adoption and American participation in the International Criminal Court ‹ both liberal positions that you oppose. So mediocre is the Miers pick that your supporters have already fallen back to the "Don't worry, we'll probably get another pick before Bush is gone" defense.

Mr. President, if you honestly believe that Harriet Miers is the most qualified candidate, then you wouldn't be qualified to be president.

But you don't believe it, and you know it. The question is "why?" You've got 55 Republicans in the Senate, you had a dozen well-qualified conservative candidates you could have chosen from, several of them women. Why pick an incompetent crony when you held all the cards?

I fear that, when all the layers are pulled away, we will find that your answer will be "because I wanted to." You knew it would leave conservatives disappointed and despondent; you know she's a second-rate nominee at best; but in your heart you are what I've always feared you were: a Bushie, a spoiled, rich-kid president's son who has spent your life doing what you wanted whenever you wanted and making sure everyone else knows it. The more people complained about cronyism, the more determined you were to shove one down our throats.

Well, Mr. President, you've certainly made that perfectly clear. You've told my fellow conservatives and me that you don't need us. That's fine, George, because we don't need you.

I'm done. I'm off the team. I have gone from a George Bush believer who reluctantly criticized you when necessary to an avowed critic who will support your positions when I can, but not your presidency.

Harriet Miers, "The best possible nominee?" That's like saying "George W. Bush, the best possible Republican president."

What a joke.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: attentionwhore; bushisagenius; chatistotheright; donnerparty; dramaqueen; getablog; icantfingchat; lookatme; michaelgraham; moonbat; mythoughtsarenews; perotesque; vanitieskill; waaaahhhhh; wisalwaysright; wisneverwrong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-259 next last
To: Sabramerican
Thankfully, supporting George W Bush is a secondary question these days, seeing as he won't be elected again.

This article will naturally annoy the 'George Bush is the greatest president in history' crowd, but for the rest of us, he's been a fine president with poor moments. Illegal immigration is the bat I'd normally pick to beat upon his policies with.

Be that as it may, he is the president, my opinion of him won't change that, and the president gets to pick the nominees. When I was picturing Bush picks for SCOTUS, I didn't picture either Miers or Roberts, I pictured Scalia and Thomas - one of those campaign promise things. Ahh well, time will tell.

What does bother me is with Miers' choice there will be less incentive for other justices to depart. It was a message to the court - if you're looking to be replaced by giants, we've already reached the bottom of the barrel.
61 posted on 10/07/2005 9:32:11 AM PDT by kingu (Draft Fmr Senator Fred Thompson for '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican
OK -- there are some valid criticisms here. But look at the bigger picture and consider the alternatives:

The Ghost of A Potential President Past

The Ghost of A Potential President Present

The Ghost of A Potential President Yet to Come

I'm sticking with "Dear George."

62 posted on 10/07/2005 9:32:21 AM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Lost his radio job when he refused to apologized to CAIR about remarks he made concerning terrorism and Islam.

He was a huge hero on FreeRepublic just weeks ago.


63 posted on 10/07/2005 9:32:27 AM PDT by Sabramerican (Islam is to Peace as Rape is to Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican

According to the infallible American pope and his sycophantic supporters, you're a sexist if you think Harriet Souter is unqualified, and you're a racist if you don't think Hurricane Katrina was caused by past discrimination! And don't argue, you DU troll!


64 posted on 10/07/2005 9:33:12 AM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Yes, and the older I get the more I tire of the constant arm-chair quarterbacking.....


65 posted on 10/07/2005 9:33:27 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican
This week he's pissed about the pick, and now he's a villain. Just like Ann, Rush, and a few others.

Funny how that works.
66 posted on 10/07/2005 9:34:10 AM PDT by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

He's the guy who said ISLAM is a terrorist organization.

That is seriously over the top, just like his stupid letter.


67 posted on 10/07/2005 9:34:32 AM PDT by W Fan in Cali
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican

Good rant. The koolaid is flowing stronger than ever around here.


68 posted on 10/07/2005 9:34:55 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican

Wow...let's all get really, really hysterical and judge the woman before the hearing...yeah, that's the logical and level-headed thing to do.

Cindie


69 posted on 10/07/2005 9:35:13 AM PDT by gardencatz (Of course he has a knife, he always has a knife, we all have knives! It's 1183 and we're barbarians!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascaryankee

Well Congress, if it wanted to, could after Breyer and Ginsburg leave or pass away take away there seats and leave it at seven seats, that would give us a majority for many moons.


70 posted on 10/07/2005 9:35:15 AM PDT by aft_lizard (This space waiting for a post election epiphany it now is: Question Everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican

Thanks for the post.


71 posted on 10/07/2005 9:36:40 AM PDT by irons_player
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican
I was beginning to think that conservatives were getting out of control with their remarks against Bush's pick...I was even thinking Ann Coulter's diatribe on Hannity the other night was way over the top...UNTL this morning when I read Charles Krauthammers article(on Drudge)against Harriet Miers. Now I'm really worried about this pick.
72 posted on 10/07/2005 9:36:54 AM PDT by ladiesview61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: W Fan in Cali

More than a few will argue that Islam *is* a terrorist orginazation.


73 posted on 10/07/2005 9:37:00 AM PDT by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Thank you for posting this information. Mark Levin made this pretty clear in the last couple of days....I suspect most folks don't realize that the what you see in the Senate is not necessarily what we get when it comes to an up or down vote.

IMHO, GWB knows what is at stake and that is the reason he has chosen Harriett.

I've changed my original thoughts on this whole thing since the original announcement by President Bush. I was ready to fight just to fight the DEMS. Guess the MSM has my last nerve hooked up to the tin foil hat.


74 posted on 10/07/2005 9:37:07 AM PDT by not2worry (What goes around comes around!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Southside_Chicago_Republican

I see this is many of the responses but it's a complete non sequitur.

Bush is not running for anything and certainly not against those people.

The only issue is whether TODAY one considers themselves a supporter of this President and his policies. Not vis a vis anyone else. Just whether you approve or disapprove of the way he does his job.


75 posted on 10/07/2005 9:37:28 AM PDT by Sabramerican (Islam is to Peace as Rape is to Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Frank_2001

LOL! That's what I've been hearing, he's lost his base.


76 posted on 10/07/2005 9:37:33 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

They could abolish the Supreme Court and I wouldn't cry.......... yet. lol Maybe later after we actually need them........


77 posted on 10/07/2005 9:37:45 AM PDT by nascaryankee (Peace Through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

The President's enemies constantly underestimate him. It sounds as if many conservatives are doing the same. I am hoping that Ms. Miers knocks everyones' socks off and that all the doubting Thomases out there eat their words.
78 posted on 10/07/2005 9:38:13 AM PDT by asp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ladiesview61
"I was beginning to think that conservatives were getting out of control with their remarks against Bush's pick...I was even thinking Ann Coulter's diatribe on Hannity the other night was way over the top...UNTL this morning when I read Charles Krauthammers article(on Drudge)against Harriet Miers. Now I'm really worried about this pick."

Don't be worried, just trust Bush. All those people are wrong and are just showboating.
79 posted on 10/07/2005 9:38:24 AM PDT by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

No self-respecting Republican OR conservative would say that Miers is the most qualified for the position.


80 posted on 10/07/2005 9:38:29 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-259 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson