[Southack]

"Unfortunately, Peter didn't pay enough attention to what the Clintons had done --- he was busy building a business. He knows how much he screwed up and has paid a very heavy price for that bad decision."

It's a thin excuse. I built up a software firm, a leasing company, a dot com firm, and ran a ranch in that same time period...and you'd be hard-pressed to say that I don't know about what the Clinton's have done...so I'm not entirely sympathetic to the "too busy" excuse.

But even if his excuse is valid...even if Peter Paul is legit...it all falls into the technically yet "unproven" category of Hillary's shenanigans. ...an area that runs the risk of actually aiding Hillary should she beat those particular charges in the court of public opinion.

That's why it is so important for us to concentrate solely upon what she has admitted to doing...which is her felony violation of the Open Meetings Act with Ira Magaziner.

She can't beat her admitted crime history...UNLESS we get distracted by chasing her with new charges (e.g. Peter Paul fundraising).

So I see no upside to going there. Hammer her on the one thing that she can't fight: her Health Care Task Force crime.

[doug from upland]

For goodness sakes, prior to the final fraudulent FEC filing of July 31, 2001, Peter sued Hillary and several others. David Kendall accepted service. Peter included the information necessary for them to make an accurate return and demanded that they do so. She cannot say that she didn't know. She had the freaking documents. This is not Peter's word against hers.

[jslade]

Very impressive home page.