Theorizing that a government is like a vast corporation, if you change the CEO, CFO, CIO, etc every few years, but leave the middle managers and low-teir employees, doesn't it take a long time to get a different result from the new leadership? Since we know with fair certainty that the Oklahoma City bombing, TWA 800, Waco, and Ruby Ridge have been covered up to a degree, doesn't it seem improbable that there have been no successful attacks since 9.11?
ping
The Admin just came out with 10 incidents that were prevented since 911. 3 of them were airplane hijackings.
They released this list Thursdsay, I think.
" doesn't it seem improbable that there have been no successful attacks since 9.11?"
I agree. I think a lot of these are truly terrorist attacks, but the media/government has spun them otherwise. Case in point: the government has managed to stop *all* Islamic terrorist attacks, however the FBI has self-admittedly not made a dent in breaking the ELF (Environmental Liberation Front). (You know those mysterious wildfires that keep cropping up? Many of them are started by these guys.)
That is because that is a false statement pushed by those on the left and those in the administration for separate reasons.
The anthrax attack came after the 9-11 attacks.
So did the DC sniper duo, the shoe bomber (caught in the act), and a number of other incidents.
The FBI expects us to believe that they are all "lone nuts" and we should stop harping on the religion of peace. Meanwhile the entire antiabortion movement is condemened (and restricted in protest) any time there is a shooting or bombing (and there have only been a handful of those).